HOA bills aim to keep owners in homes

Homeowners associations’ foreclosure filings on thousands of Coloradans’ houses over unpaid fines and fees have spurred fresh attempts by lawmakers to better regulate HOAS and metropolitan districts with the hope of preventing more people from losing their homes.

Lawmakers have introduced several reform bills that would restrict foreclosures from delinquent fees and require HOAS and metro districts to adopt written policies, enhance notifications to homeowners and add licensing requirements for professional managers. The legislation would also set regulations on how much homeowners can be charged. HOAS would be required to work with homeowners before beginning any foreclosure proceedings.

“As more Coloradans find themselves living in HOAS and metro districts, it is more important than ever that homeowners be protected from losing the largest asset they will ever invest in through unnecessary foreclosure,” said Rep. Iman Jodeh, an Aurora Democrat who is sponsoring two bills.

Homeowners associations in Colorado legally have the power to place liens on residents’ homes that supersede even those of the banks that hold their mortgages. An HOA can then sell a property to collect the money a resident owes — and the owner still would be left with mortgage debt and none of the equity they had built.

About half of Colorado residents live in communities overseen by an HOA.

The associations’ power drew more scrutiny in 2022 following media reports, including by The Denver Post, about the Master Homeowners Association for Green Valley Ranch in far-northeast Denver. That HOA filed nearly half of all HOA foreclosures in Denver the prior year.

The foreclosed homes included affordable housing-designated units that were sold in auctions to investors, in violation of city covenants.

Neighborhood residents who are Black, Asian or Latino said they sometimes weren’t notified of the fines or would continue to accrue new fees and interest even after resolving the violations. In some cases, residents didn’t even know their homes had been placed in foreclosure proceedings until someone showed up at their door and said they now owned the home.

A 2022 analysis by Propublica and Rocky Mountain PBS found that the state’s HOAS filed more than 2,400 foreclosure cases from January 2018 through February 2022. The legislature passed a law in 2022 to protect homeowners from accumulating HOA fines and fees that they may not be aware of by requiring HOAS to provide written notice to residents, in their preferred language, about any violations. It also capped the fees HOAS could assess.

But lawmakers say there is much more to be done for communities across metro Denver to limit Hoa-driven foreclosures and protect homeowners from predatory or mismanaged companies.

“We’re fighting for homeowners,” said Rep. Naquetta Ricks, an Aurora Democrat, adding that this was especially important amid the state’s ongoing housing crisis. “We want to make sure people stay housed in Colorado.”

A statewide committee, the HOA Homeowners’ Rights Task Force, was charged with studying issues related to metro districts and HOAS, and its members recommended multiple areas of focus for the 2024 session. Lawmakers have incorporated at least two recommendations into new bills — creating an alternative dispute resolution process and addressing licensure of community association managers.

The task force is expected to release a final report by April 15.

The new bills introduced so far during the 2024 session include:

• HB24-1267, which would require metro districts that conduct covenant enforcement like HOAS to adopt written policies on fines and fees and on governing disputes. It also would prevent the metro districts from foreclosing on any lien because of delinquent fees.

• HB24-1158, which would require changes to HOA notifications to owners on delinquent accounts and before lien foreclosures, and it would establish a minimum bid.

• HB24-1337, which would limit a homeowner’s reimbursement of collection costs and attorney fees to 50% and prohibit an HOA from foreclosing on a lien until it has tried to serve an owner with a civil action within 180 days or obtained a personal judgment in a civil action. It also would prohibit the purchaser of a home in foreclosure from selling for 180 days, with the former owner having first priority of buying the home again.

• HB24-1078, which would reestablish license requirements for HOA community association managers (a program that expired in July 2018).

So far, just two bills have been considered by committees. HB-1267 passed 10-0 in a House committee Wednesday, and no one spoke in opposition to the bill. Jodeh said she worked with metro districts when crafting the legislation.

• HB-1078, the licensure bill, passed 8-3 in a House committee Feb. 14, eliciting support from homeowners who had faced HOA foreclosures and opposition from community management associations.

Arvada Democratic Rep. Brianna Titone, a former HOA president, is one of the sponsors of the bill. The legislature passed a similar bill in 2019, but Gov. Jared Polis vetoed it. At the time, Polis’ office said he was concerned about costs to get licensed that would then be passed to consumers, even though a 2017 report from the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies recommended an extension, and a 2021 report also recommended regulation.

Titone said the new licensing bill would “make sure that people are educated about the law and make sure that no felons are getting involved in having full access to communities’ money.”

The bill would also ensure managers know how to do their jobs, Titone added, so that they don’t have to hire attorneys to help, costing residents even more money. And it would require companies to disclose relationships that include identifying whom they’re providing kickbacks to, she said.

The requirements would apply only to professional management companies, not employees directly hired by HOA boards.

“I’ve come here with licensing in 2019. I’ve come with licensing in 2022. And I’ve come with licensing today,” Titone said at the committee hearing, and “nobody has ever suggested an alternative. … They just say no. … You should ask yourself why they don’t want this. It’s because they’re making a lot of money off of the backs of the people they work for and they’re hired by.”