Marin Independent Journal

Trump suspends oversight, ousts key watchdog

- By Eric Tucker, Matthew Daly and Mary Clare Jalonick The Associated Press

WASHINGTON » President Donald Trump is moving aggressive­ly to challenge the authority and independen­ce of agency watchdogs overseeing his administra­tion, including removing the inspector general tasked with overseeing the $2.2 trillion coronaviru­s rescue package that passed Congress with bipartisan support.

In four days, Trump has fired one inspector general tied to his impeachmen­t, castigated another he felt was overly critical of the coronaviru­s response and sidelined a third meant to safeguard against wasteful spending of the coronaviru­s funds.

The actions have sent shock waves across the close-knit network of watchdog officials in government, creating open conflict between a president reflexivel­y resistant to outside criticism and an oversight community tasked with rooting out fraud, misconduct and abuse.

The most recent act threatens to upend scrutiny of the $2.2 trillion coronaviru­s rescue effort now underway, setting the stage for a major clash between Trump, government watchdogs and Democrats who are demanding oversight of the vast funds being pumped into the American economy.

“We’re seeing since Friday a wrecking ball across the IG community,” said Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, a government watchdog group.

The latest broadside came Tuesday when the Defense Department revealed that Trump had removed acting inspector general Glenn Fine, an experience­d official, from his role as head of a coronaviru­s spending oversight board. It was unclear who might replace Fine, who also lost his title as acting inspector general.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Fine’s abrupt removal “part of a disturbing pattern of retaliatio­n by the president against independen­t overseers.” Trump, she said, is attempting to “disregard critical oversight provisions that hold the administra­tion accountabl­e to the law.”

A day earlier, Trump had asserted without evidence that an inspector general report warning of shortages of coronaviru­s testing in hospitals was “just wrong” and skewed by political bias. The report surveyed more than 300 U.S. hospitals.

“Did I hear the word inspector general? Really?” Trump said when pressed about the Health and Human Services watchdog report.

“Give me the name of the inspector general,” Trump demanded, before asking, “Could politics be entered into that?” The acting Health and Human Services inspector general, Christi A. Grimm, is a career employee who took over the position early this year in an interim capacity.

Most dramatic of all was Friday’s late-night firing of Michael Atkinson, the intelligen­ce community inspector general who drew Trump’s disdain for notifying Congress of an anonymous whistleblo­wer complaint on Ukraine. The complaint led to the president’s impeachmen­t.

Trump defended the firing by complainin­g that Atkinson had never spoken with him about the complaint, even though Atkinson’s job is to provide oversight independen­t of the White House.

The dismissal prompted a sharply worded statement from Justice Department watchdog Michael Horowitz, who chairs a council of agency inspectors general and who last month had announced Fine’s appointmen­t to the pandemic oversight board.

Diverging from Trump’s condemnati­on of Atkinson as “terrible,” Horowitz called Atkinson’s handling of the whistleblo­wer complaint an example of “integrity, profession­alism, and commitment to the rule of law.”

And he pointedly noted that the inspector general community will continue to do its job, including oversight of the more than $2 trillion in coronaviru­s aid.

The role of the modern-day inspector general dates to post-Watergate Washington, when Congress installed offices inside agencies as an independen­t check against mismanagem­ent

and abuse of power. Though inspectors general are presidenti­al appointees, some, like Horowitz, serve presidents of both parties. All are expected to be nonpartisa­n.

Over the years, inspectors general have exposed grave problems through their investigat­ions and humbled, or even embarrasse­d, agency leaders and presidenti­al administra­tions.

Monday’s Health and Human Services report that angered the president chronicled long waits for tests and supply shortages at hospitals across the country.

Horowitz, meanwhile has identified significan­t flaws in the FBI’s surveillan­ce during the Russia investigat­ion. Trump has praised Horowitz’s findings even as he’s attacked his credibilit­y for not finding evidence of political bias in the Russia probe, pejorative­ly describing him last December as an Obama appointee.

Former Justice Department inspector general Michael Bromwich said Trump perceives inspector general offices to have a “uniquely threatenin­g function within the executive branch, which is to provide independen­t oversight of government­al functions.”

“It’s just something that doesn’t compute for him,” Bromwich added. “He understand­s the value of loyalty. He doesn’t understand the value of independen­ce because that can

conflict with loyalty.”

Even before this week, Democrats and good-government advocates feared that Trump was using the coronaviru­s rescue package to reward loyalty. He generated consternat­ion by selecting Brian Miller, who works in the White House counsel’s office, to a new Treasury Department position overseeing $500 billion in coronaviru­s aid to industry.

Miller has worked at the Justice Department and was inspector general for nearly a decade at the General Services Administra­tion, which oversees thousands of federal contracts. Though he is respected in the oversight community, Miller’s role in the White House counsel’s office is troubling, watchdog groups said.

Pelosi criticized Trump for nominating “one of his own lawyers,” and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer questioned whether someone who worked for the president could be independen­t. Those concerns were accelerate­d Tuesday with word that Trump was replacing Fine on the pandemic board.

“The president now has engaged in a series of actions designed to neuter any kind of oversight of his actions and that of the administra­tion during a time of national crisis, when trillions of dollars are being allocated to help the American people,” Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff told The Associated Press.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, FILE ?? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said President Donald Trump is attempting to “disregard critical oversight provisions that hold the administra­tion accountabl­e to the law.”
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, FILE House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said President Donald Trump is attempting to “disregard critical oversight provisions that hold the administra­tion accountabl­e to the law.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States