USPS disputes claims about service cuts

Lawyers for the USPS argued in court against accusations that service cuts are slowing down the mail.

Lawyers for the U.S. Postal Service argued in court Thursday against accusations that service cuts are slowing down the mail and threatening the integrity of the presidential election.

The latest hearing on the issue took place in federal court in Philadelphia, where the attorneys general from six states and the District of Columbia have sued.

They argue that on-time delivery dropped sharply in July and has not fully rebounded as the nation battles a pandemic and prepares for an election that could hinge onmail-in ballots.

“There was a sharp dip in early July that hasn’t rebounded to where it was, even today,” Deputy Attorney General Aimee D. Thomson of Pennsylvania argued.

Judges in Washington state and NewYork have issued emergency orders this month in similar cases. The others states involved in Thursday’s hearing are California,

Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts and North Carolina.

Thomson said the evidence shows a slowdown order came from headquarters this summer after Postmaster General Louis DeJoy took over the service.

Lawyers for the Postal Service say headquarters never ordered a slowdown or overtime ban. However, upon questioning from the judge, they conceded that local postal managers may have misconstrued the guidance from Washington and thought the stated goal of reducing overtime was actually a mandate.

The state officials said that on-time delivery of first- class mail fell 10% from July to August, aggravating and even endangering customers who rely on mail delivery for food, medications and other essentials.

They said the cuts also threaten the integrity of the upcoming election, given the expected widespread use of mail-in ballots across the country.

U.S. District Judge Gerald A. McHugh Jr. did not immediately rule.