Marin Independent Journal

Water district must begin desal discussion now

-

I am writing in regard to a continued reluctance to think long term by leadership of the Marin Municipal Water District.

In the last few months, there have been numerous articles and letters published in the Marin IJ, including mine, raising the issue of desalinati­on as a long term means of addressing the impacts on climate change on Marin’s water supply. Most of the letters I have read favor this as one of the potential solutions to providing clean water to meet the current and future demands of the county. Yet, as enumerated in both letters to the editor and Marin Voice commentari­es, as well as the meetings of the MMWD Board of Directors,

most discussion about desalinati­on has been deferred for a variety of reasons, many of them dubious.

What is disappoint­ing, but perhaps not surprising, is that a number of MMWD board members continue to put emphasis on conservati­on and a pipeline across the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. This, even though water use has decreased over time, especially when compared to a few years ago. A longer term look at a pipeline begs the question of where that water will come from as climate change affects all of Central California.

I don’t understand why the board doesn’t start a comprehens­ive engineerin­g study on building a desalinati­on facility so that they and we, the water users in Marin, understand the costs, environmen­tal impacts and everything else. That way a decision can be made with real, current informatio­n. Most businesses do this in order to make long term decisions on cost versus benefits of major projects.

It seems to me that if the board is not willing to do this, we need to replace those board members with ones who are.

— Steve Ziman, San Rafael

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States