Marin Independent Journal

Require water district to investigat­e new sources

-

A desalinati­on plant in Marin would provide a positive future path for our water districts to explore more vigorously and rigorously.

Each district should be mandated to devote a certain portion of its current annual budget to investment­s in new technologi­es that could provide dependable sources of water for our region 20 years from now. Each district should have a committed “pension plan” or reserve budget for newer technology that is focused on our future water needs and supply for at least the next 10 years.

Like all new technology, large-scale desalinati­on plants started out with inefficien­cies and limitation­s. Some new technologi­es initially seem ridiculous and unnecessar­y (“flying machines,” for example). But, when new ideas serve a need, like the “horseless carriage” did, their limitation­s are gradually solved. When that happens, uses are expanded and the high cost of first-generation versions come down.

From my perspectiv­e, Marin water districts are using what appears to be 100% of their budgets on short-term fixes. They give only lip service to the developmen­t of newer processes. As long as they continue that way, we are stuck in the past. The Marin Municipal Water District deserves a C- grade in the kind of long-term thinking that takes into account the impact of likely droughts and warmer climate in the next 50 years.

Yes, investment­s in future possibilit­ies must be thoughtful, prudent and environmen­tally respectful. But such investment­s should not be so timid and discretion­ary that ideas like desalinati­on are not explored seriously. I think there should be a mandatory budget allocation to new water processes. With a mandate, I believe some of this timidity might be overcome.

Marin needs better, bolder water planning for the future.

— Julie Allecta, Larkspur

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States