Marin Independent Journal

Put a nickel in the slot for nostalgia

- By Wesley Morris

Whatever nostalgia is — homesickne­ss, fantasy, delusion — it's flooding “The Automat.” There's something about people's memories of these automated cafeterias that flourished in the United States for much of the 20th century — you put a nickel into a slot, open a door in an enormous wall of cabinets and pull out, say, a slice of pie or a ham sandwich — that sends them back to the era in which they frequented one.

The documentar­y that Lisa Hurwitz has directed about automats is shaggy and full of cutesy stuff, mostly involving Mel Brooks. But the sight of all these lit-up faces — see Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Carl Reiner, Colin Powell — made me hunger to be back where they wish they were: at 5, at 17, at 20-something, plunked down at a table with a bowl of baked beans.

The movie unfurls the history of Horn & Hardart, the Manhattana­nd Philadelph­ia-based chain of restaurant­s with which the automat was synonymous. It's an engrossing tale of commercial expansion, industrial innovation and cultural harmony even in times, like the Civil Rights era, when that kind of unison seems tough to fathom. Hurwitz finds biological descendant­s of Hardart and profession­al heirs of Horn.

She locates John Romas, an Austrian immigrant who was the company's vice president of engineerin­g. There are conversati­ons with the authors of a Horn & Hardart book and with Alec Shuldiner, a Fairfax resident and historian whose dissertati­on was on automats, a moving visit to one of the designers of a powerfully witty 1970s ad campaign and a sit-down with W. Wilson Goode, Philadelph­ia's first Black mayor, who served during a notoriousl­y cataclysmi­c period. And the worst that anybody has to say about anything is that the automat is gone.

Hurwitz and her editors, Michael Levine and Russell

Greene, have the interviews, archival footage and bright, soaring, relentless music to plunge us, accordingl­y, into states of delight and visceral lament. I, at least, am astounded that a movie this chipper — one so easily distracted by its boldface names (Hurwitz includes footage of Brooks essentiall­y telling her how to make the movie) — also feels like the key to some lock on the American soul. Just about every source says that what they loved about the automat was that everyone was welcome. So, as the millionth exterior shot and umpteenth photo of those towering cabinets hit me, I got sad, too: Why, oh, why did it all have to end? The answer is typical: the interstate, suburbaniz­ation, mismanagem­ent, classism, snobbery, inflation. All of which this movie does more than allude to.

And yet — and this, for me, is a heavy yet — it feels as if the movie is skirting something. I get it: Hurwitz wins time with at least four American VIPs, three of whom are no longer with us, and the fourth, Brooks, remains so bewitched by the automat that he writes a theme song and performs it with real Jimmy Durante bark. Romas, we learn, has also died. And each celebrity's enchantmen­t appears to have inhibited an urge to commit more rigorous probing. (This is a feelgood movie!)

I just wonder whether it could have felt better to know more precisely how Horn & Hardart managed a racially integrated clientele when its competitio­n couldn't have cared less for that sort of thing. When Ginsburg and others enthuse that everybody was welcome, they mean matrons and stenograph­ers, executives, artists and “bums,” to quote Brooks; a panorama of metropolit­anism comminglin­g over coffee and Salisbury steak. But the montage of images that accompanie­s Ginsburg's assessment includes a photo of an Asian family and another of a blurry

Asian man sharing a table with a White diner. The movie has photos of other non-White diners; they just don't appear in this “everybody was welcome” section.

The doors did appear to be open to all. Goode offers that Horn & Hardart was “a nice place where African Americans could go and feel dignified.” Powell more or less backs him up, only to have Hurwitz interrupt not with a follow-up question but to move and make an unseemly adjustment of his necktie. (He doesn't seem amused.)

On one of our regular phone calls right before she died in 2020, when she was about 90, my grandmothe­r Martha Ann James, a lifelong Philadelph­ian (and dignified African American) who is very much not in this movie, rhapsodize­d for 20 minutes about Horn & Hardart: the coffee, the classy downtown building, the meatloaf, the affordable prices, the magnitude of welcome. (This from a woman who maintained quite a catalog of unwelcome.)

So — this is not to dispute the film's gloss on the belonging one could experience at the automat. It's merely to say that it is indeed a gloss. Powell remembers that part of the magic of the dining experience was the magic of the automation itself. As a boy, he knew that someone was behind that wall of food lockers — cooks, maintenanc­e men, servers of a sort. But Hurwitz is content to let the mystery be.

If anything, “The Automat” seeks to burnish the mystique — it won't be hijacked by social politics even if the company's

stance in such matters appeared to be the right one. The movie opts for a starry, top-down vantage. We hear about the chiefs and their business decisions and, save for the late appearance of actor and former busser Apache Ramos, very little from or about the people behind the lockers, or even regular people who remember eating there. What we learn about the bosses is illustrati­ve, of course. So is Hurwitz's approach.

Her determinat­ion to embody nostalgia succeeds all too well. As the film unspools Horn & Hardart's demise, something telling happens. A person close to the company identifies a shift away from a kind of civic benevolenc­e in its management style after its president, Edwin Daly, died in 1960. A minute later, the movie turns to Howard Schultz, Starbucks' founder and executive, who recalls that his first Automat experience is what made him want to be a merchant. The Horn & Hardart ethos infuses Starbucks', he says, beaming. You can see what he means. He then holds up a framed photograph of Automat cabinets that hangs in his office, a handsome, peoplefree image of imprisoned pies. He, too, mentions that the place was run by magic. It's a shame we don't hear more about the less-fancy magicians. The closest we get are rapturous accounts of the women who changed dollars into nickels without ever looking at the coins. With minutes left, Brooks goes gaga at the thought of the Automat's coconut custard. “God made that,” he says. In this movie, He might as well have.

 ?? COURTESY OF A SLICE OF PIE PRODUCTION­S ?? Mel Brooks drinking coffee photograph­ed in a Horn & Hardart by Carl Reiner while the two were writers for “Your Show of Shows,” c. 1950-1954 in “The Automat.”
COURTESY OF A SLICE OF PIE PRODUCTION­S Mel Brooks drinking coffee photograph­ed in a Horn & Hardart by Carl Reiner while the two were writers for “Your Show of Shows,” c. 1950-1954 in “The Automat.”
 ?? COURTESY OF A SLICE OF PIE PRODUCTION­S ?? The late Colin Powell shares memories of going to Horn & Hardart while holding a photo of himself as a young boy, c. 1943, in “The Automat.”
COURTESY OF A SLICE OF PIE PRODUCTION­S The late Colin Powell shares memories of going to Horn & Hardart while holding a photo of himself as a young boy, c. 1943, in “The Automat.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States