Marin Independent Journal

Federal funding levels in flux as US redefines `urban'

- By Mike Schneider

Hundreds of urban areas in the U.S. are becoming rural, but it's not because people are leaving.

It's just that the U.S. Census Bureau is changing the definition of an urban area. Under the new criteria, more than 1,300 small cities, towns and villages designated urban a decade ago would be considered rural.

That matters because urban and rural areas qualify for different types of federal funding. Some communitie­s worry the change could affect health clinics in rural areas as well as transporta­tion and education funding from federal programs. But leaders in other communitie­s designated to lose their urban status say it won't make a difference.

“We are rural and we feel rural, and that's how we already identify,” said Randy Reeg, city administra­tor of Mauston, Wisconsin, a city of 4,347 residents about 75 miles northwest of Madison.

Groups like the American Hospital Associatio­n say the changes, which are the biggest being made to the definition­s in decades, could cause problems for people who need medical care in rural areas.

“Going with the new definition could limit the number of rural health clinics moving forward and have a negative impact on rural access to care,” said Shannon Wu, senior associate director

of policy at the hospital associatio­n.

For starters, the Census Bureau is switching to housing units instead of people as the basis for calculatin­g what should be an urban area. Bureau officials say the change will make it easier to update between once-a-decade head counts of the U.S. They also contend that it's needed because a new privacy method introduces errors into 2020 census population numbers at small geographie­s to protect people's identities. Housing counts stay accurate under the method.

A place had to have at least 2,500 people to be urban

under old criteria that lasted more than a century. Now, it will need at least 2,000 housing units, the equivalent of about 5,000 people. A revised list of urban areas won't be released until later this year, but a third of the areas deemed urban a decade ago would be knocked into the rural category under the new criteria.

Places with 50,000 residents or more were considered “urbanized areas,” compared with “urban clusters” having between 2,500 and 49,999 residents in the past. But those distinctio­ns will be eliminated and all will be called urban areas

under the new definition.

Some communitie­s worry that the switch to housing units will cause some areas to be underestim­ated if the Census Bureau uses the U.S. average of 2.6 people per household for its calculatio­ns. For instance, Madera County, California, has 3.3 people per household, and the change “would not fully represent the community,” Patricia Taylor, executive director of the Madera County Transporta­tion Commission, said in a letter to the bureau last year.

The Census Bureau says the new definition should be used for statistica­l purposes only. But the bureau's urban areas form the cores of metro and micro areas, and its definition­s provide the basis for how other agencies classify urban and rural areas in determinin­g eligibilit­y for federal funding. The bureau reviews the definition­s every 10 years after a census, and the urban population has grown from about 45% of the total U.S. population in 1910 to more than 80% a decade ago.

“We've heard people say 2,500 was too low. That was the impetus for the increase,” said Michael Ratcliffe, a senior geographer with the Census Bureau.

Different federal programs use different definition­s of urban and rural, and some communitie­s qualify for rural funding for some programs and not others. But any changes “will have significan­t implicatio­ns for many groups and communitie­s,” said Kenneth Johnson, a senior demographe­r at the University of New Hampshire who studies rural issues.

“Another likely concern for many rural communitie­s is that if many existing urban areas are redefined as rural, competitio­n for the limited rural funds will increase,” Johnson said.

A coalition of associatio­ns representi­ng cities, counties, planners and transporta­tion groups had objected to many of the proposed changes last year, saying the switch from people to housing units would miss variations in developmen­t and land use patterns.

The Census Bureau tried to address those concerns by creating three levels of urban area definition­s for census blocks, which are the nation's smallest geographic unit. Census blocks will be urban if they have 425 housing units per square mile, the equivalent of 1,105 people. Before the change, census blocks with at least 500 people per square mile were considered urban.

The redesignat­ion gives the bureau a way to distinguis­h between the “urban nucleus” and less densely populated areas, typically on the fringes of urban areas.

Bill Keyrouze, executive director of Associatio­n of Metropolit­an Planning Organizati­ons, said the Census Bureau's revisions, adding different levels of urban areas based on density, “was an adequate compromise.”

For the town of DeMotte, Indiana, 85 miles (135 kilometers) southwest of South Bend, which won't qualify as an urban area anymore, it doesn't really matter from a “status” viewpoint, Town Manager Michael Cain said.

“You are who you are. The number of people doesn't matter. It's the spirit of the community that matters, whether your town is a cohesive group of people who care about each other,” Cain said.

 ?? BRENNAN LINSLEY — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? A train carries blades for wind turbines through Rocky Ford, Colorado. Under new criteria from the U.S. Census Bureau, Rocky Ford will no longer qualify as an “urban” area.
BRENNAN LINSLEY — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS A train carries blades for wind turbines through Rocky Ford, Colorado. Under new criteria from the U.S. Census Bureau, Rocky Ford will no longer qualify as an “urban” area.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States