Marin Independent Journal

Lawsuit challenges policy on air tours at Marin sites

Activists want environmen­tal studies by federal agencies

- By Will Houston whouston@marinij.com

A lawsuit filed by environmen­tal groups alleges the National Park Service and the Federal Aviation Administra­tion violated federal law by approving a plan to regulate air tours over Marin County's national parks without adequately studying environmen­tal impacts.

The Public Employees for Environmen­tal Responsibi­lity, the Marin Audubon Society and the Watershed Alliance of Marin groups are calling on the court to toss the park service's air tour management plan adopted in January for the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, the Point Reyes National Seashore, Muir Woods National Monument and the San Francisco Maritime National Historic Park.

The groups are seeking a court order requiring an environmen­tal analysis and limiting the number of flights over the parks to 50 per year until a new plan is adopted. The plan allows for about 2,600 trips annually.

“The ability of commercial tour operators to fly above national parks is not a right, it is a privilege — a privilege that must be subordinat­e to the values these parks were establishe­d to preserve,” said Jeff Ruch of the Public Employees for Environmen­tal Responsibi­lity.

FAA spokespers­on Emma Duncan declined to comment, citing the pending litigation. The National Park Service deferred comment to the U.S. Department of Justice, which did not respond to a request for comment on Monday.

“They really didn't do an environmen­tal review so we want them to do an adequate environmen­tal analysis of the impacts.”

— Barbara Salzman, Marin Audubon

The Federal Aviation Administra­tion and the National Park Service were required under a law passed in 2000 to develop air tour management plans regulating noise and other impacts from airplane and helicopter tours at national parks. The plans were only required for parks that have more than 50 commercial tourist flights each year.

The legislatio­n was largely a response to noise impact concerns of air tours over national parks such as the Grand Canyon and national parks in Hawaii, where several air tour companies seek to meet the demands of tens of thousands of tourists every year.

The Bay Area has two companies allowed to fly over its national parks: San Francisco Helicopter­s and Seaplane Adventures of Mill Valley. Seaplane Adventures is the only operating air tour company flying over the parks.

Under the plan adopted in January, the two companies are allowed to fly a combined total of about 2,600 trips over the four Bay Area parks.

Under the previous interim plan, the two companies were allowed to make a total of about 5,900 trips per year, which the park service said greatly exceeded the number of air tours that actually occurred. The new trip limit was based on a three-year average of trips from 2017-2019.

Only 143 airplane tours are allowed to fly over Point Reyes each year. Helicopter tours would be barred from flying over Point Reyes and all air tours would be prohibited over Muir Woods National Monument.

The plan also set new restrictio­ns on altitudes, flight times, routes and distance from sensitive wildlife areas.

The lawsuit asks the federal court to slash the total number of flights to 50 per year until environmen­tal studies have occurred and a new plan is adopted.

The environmen­tal organizati­ons allege that the park did not conduct a full environmen­tal review or noise surveys when developing the plan. The groups also criticized the plan for setting a buffer distance of 2,000 feet away from cattle ranches in Point Reyes National Seashore compared to 1,000 feet from nesting seabird colonies, peregrine falcon nests and marine mammal haul-out areas.

“We have an incredible diversity of wildlife from all the marine mammals and birds that roost, nest and pup along the coast,” said Barbara Salzman, executive director of Marin Audubon. “They really didn't do an environmen­tal review so we want them to do an adequate environmen­tal analysis of the impacts. All they did was basically accept what's been going on.”

The lawsuit is the second to be filed by the environmen­tal group relating to the air tour plans.

In 2017, the Public Employees

for Environmen­tal Responsibi­lity sued the two federal agencies to adopt air management plans for 24 national parks that had been delayed for nearly two decades. The agencies had allowed air tours to continue under interim plans. In November 2020, an appeals court ordered that the agencies must complete the management plans for 24 national parks before the end of August 2022.

Ruch said nine of these plans have yet to be completed.

“This arose from the frustratio­n of park service employees in parks where incessant helicopter noise was disturbing wildlife, interrupti­ng natural resource studies and compromisi­ng the visitor experience,” Ruch said. “They were told by the FAA that your jurisdicti­on stops at the treetops. This law was the only vehicle for addressing that.”

A copy of the air tour management plan can be found at parkplanni­ng.nps. gov/BayAreaATM­P.

 ?? SHERRY LAVARS — MARIN INDEPENDEN­T JOURNAL ?? Rodeo Beach is among the Marin attraction­s in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which is covered under a plan that regulates sightseein­g flights over several local federal parks.
SHERRY LAVARS — MARIN INDEPENDEN­T JOURNAL Rodeo Beach is among the Marin attraction­s in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which is covered under a plan that regulates sightseein­g flights over several local federal parks.
 ?? ALAN DEP — MARIN INDEPENDEN­T JOURNAL ?? Signs alert visitors to the quiet zone in Cathedral Grove at
Muir Woods National Monument. Environmen­talists want further reductions in the number of air tours allowed over local federal parks.
ALAN DEP — MARIN INDEPENDEN­T JOURNAL Signs alert visitors to the quiet zone in Cathedral Grove at Muir Woods National Monument. Environmen­talists want further reductions in the number of air tours allowed over local federal parks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States