Marin Independent Journal

Cluster-bomb use is an admission that it's OK to kill civilians

- By Stephen J. Lyons Stephen J. Lyons is the author of five books. His new book “Searching for Home, Adventures with Misanthrop­es” will be published in July. ©2023 Chicago Tribune. Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency.

In 2008, more than 100 nations signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions, a treaty that “prohibits the use, production, stockpilin­g and transfer of cluster munitions.”

The United States did not accede to the convention. Neither did Ukraine nor Russia, both of whom are using these weapons in their seemingly forever war.

A cluster munition is a weapon that keeps on killing long after its 72 submunitio­ns, or bomblets, are shot in a shell from a 155 mm artillery weapon. Upon explosion in the air, they can litter an area the size of several football fields. If that wasn't horrible enough, these submunitio­ns have, according to various government estimates, a “dud,” or unexploded rate, of 2.35% to 6%. That means that every time a cluster bomb is employed, two to four of those 72 bomblets do not explode upon impact.

But “dud” doesn't mean these submunitio­ns stay inactive. They can have the same dangerous lingering effect as a land mine. They stay active for decades. Children are often attracted to the colorful objects with disastrous outcomes.

The estimated dud rate is disputable. According to the Congressio­nal Research Service, “There appear to be significan­t discrepanc­ies among failure rate estimates. Some manufactur­ers claim a submunitio­n failure rate of 2% to 5%, whereas mine clearance specialist­s have frequently reported failure rates of 10% to 30%.

The United States has a huge stockpile of cluster munitions — 4.7 million containing hundreds of millions of bomblets — that it is dusting off to deliver to Ukraine after a “difficult decision” by President Joe Biden.

The United States last used these munitions in its military excursion in Afghanista­n. Trouble was that the little bombs resembled in color and shape the humanitari­an aid packets that the United States dropped from planes. This confusion, which obviously left many civilians maimed or dead, led to the curtailmen­t of cluster bombs for our next military adventure.

Recently, the internatio­nal nongovernm­ental organizati­on Human Rights Watch released a report from Kyiv that found that “Ukrainian forces have used cluster munitions that caused numerous deaths and serious injuries to civilians.” The report also noted that Russians have used cluster munitions, “killing many civilians and causing other serious civilian harm.”

Yes, Ukrainian civilians. Friendly fire. Price of war. Collateral damage.

In announcing the U.S.' decision to send these horrific weapons of war to Ukraine, Biden's national security mouthpiece, Jake Sullivan, admitted, “We recognize that cluster munitions create a risk of civilian harm from unexploded ordnance. This is why we deferred the decision for as long as we could.”

So there it is, an admission at the highest level of our government that more innocents will die because of the use of these evil weapons of war. Additional­ly, large areas of arable land will no longer be able to be farmed because of these de facto mine fields.

In September 2016, Textron Systems, the last U.S. company to manufactur­e cluster bombs, ceased production of those munitions. For humanitari­an reasons? Nope.

“Historical­ly, sensorfuze­d weapon sales have relied on foreign military and direct commercial internatio­nal customers for which both executive branch and congressio­nal approval is required. The current political environmen­t has made it difficult to obtain these approvals,” the company complained.

The company was most upset that its proposed sale of cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia to use in that country's scorched earth campaign in Yemen was blocked by the White House.

But that was about seven years ago, an eternity for a country that routinely ignores history's lessons. With Biden's decision to supply these longlastin­g instrument­s of destructio­n to Ukraine, that political environmen­t has now changed for the worse.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States