Southern Maryland News

Maryland patients still waiting on medical marijuana

- By KATISHI MAAKE Capital News Service

ANNAPOLIS — While Maryland is on pace to have one of the slowest rollouts of medical mar- ijuana in the country, patients across the state must skirt the law if they want to treat themselves.

It has been more than 900 days since former Gov. Martin O’Malley signed the bill legalizing medical marijuana in the state.

Dispensari­es are antici- pated to open by next sum- mer, but legal fights with the Natalie M. LaPrade Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission over licenses to grow the plant has many concerned that access will keep patients waiting longer.

One company that applied for a growing li- cense but was denied has filed suit against the com- mission, with two others planning to do so, all say- ing the licensing process was unfair and improper.

And the Legislativ­e Black Caucus, concerned about a lack of minority ownership among preliminar­y licensees, plans to introduce emergency leg- islation in the next Gener- al Assembly session calling for the commission to restart the process.

While state officials grapple with who should grow, process and sell the drug, some Maryland pa- tients are suffering — or medicating themselves outside the law.

“I was 26 years old before I tried pot for the first time, and it was strictly as pain management,” said Rachel Perry-Crook, ex- ecutive director of Maryland NORML, an orga- nization that promotes marijuana legalizati­on.

Perry-Crook, now 30, said she has used marijua- na for four years to help alleviate pain from a num- ber of different ailments, including undergoing four back surgeries and a spinal fusion. She has a connective tissue disor- der known as Ehlers-Dan- los syndrome, she said, that causes hypermobil- ity, leaving her body in constant pain.

She said she turned to marijuana after years of taking a prescripti­on opi- oid medication meant to treat severe pain.

“I was taking Dilaudid for years — very high dosages of Dilaudid to the point where it would put a lot of people in a coma,” Perry-Crook told the University of Maryland’s Capital News Service. “I looked at myself one day and I realized I was going to turn into a junkie if I didn’t find something else to manage my pain.”

The state granted pre-approval to 15 proces- sors and 15 growers in August.

Medical cannabis producer Green Thumb Industries-Maryland, based in Prince George’s County, filed a lawsuit against the commission on Sept. 19. The company said it was on the list of 15 pre-approved growers in July, then subsequent- ly and unfairly removed when the ranking process was changed to factor in the geographic diversity of the applicants.

“The path we’re pursuing now is a last resort; we feel like we’ve ex- hausted all other remedies,” Pete Kadens, CEO of GTI-Maryland, said during a press conference late last month. “The last thing we want to do … is further distress sick pa- tients.”

A little more than a week later, another rejected grower, Maryland Cultivatio­n and Processing, petitioned to join the lawsuit, which was filed in the Baltimore City Circuit Court.

Additional­ly, members of the state’s Legislativ­e Black Caucus, among others, have also taken issue with the lack of racial diversity among the 30 pre-approved processors and growers.

“We are not going to let anybody get licenses under the scenario that ex- ists now,” state Delegate Cheryl Glenn, D-Balti- more said during a Legislativ­e Black Caucus meet- ing on Oct. 6.

Alternativ­e Medicine Maryland, which is ma- jority African-American owned, was also denied a license by the commission. The group will file a lawsuit in the coming weeks demanding the commission stop the licensing process and mandate racial diversity, according to John Pica, an attorney for the group.

“Sometimes I wonder if our applicatio­n was even reviewed,” Pica said. “Afri- can-American companies have been stiff-armed in this industry.”

Some industry advocates are concerned that the legal battles, though valid, will mean sick pa- tients are left waiting for even longer.

“We are very concerned with the lack of diversi- ty that is in the current pre-approvals,” said Kate Bell, legislativ­e counsel with the Marijuana Policy Project, a cannabis advocacy group. “But we have to remember that – fundamenta­lly – this is about protecting sick patients.”

On April 14, 2014, Mar yland joined the 25 states and Washington, D.C., to legalize medical marijuana. Of the three states that passed the legislatio­n in 2014, Maryland is the only one where patients do not yet have legal access to cannabis.

The commission plans to administer patient cards six months prior to the anticipate­d opening of dispensari­es, according to its website.

Mike Liszewski, gov- ernment affairs director for Americans for Safe Access, said Maryland is taking longer than most states to bring medical marijuana to its patients. While he predicts patients will be able to receive legal medicine by mid to late 2017, he said addi- tional lawsuits and injunction­s could push that back further.

Hawaii’s June 2000 medical marijuana law al- lowed patients to use and cultivate the plant with a doctor’s prescripti­on. The state approved an amendment in July 2015 that allowed dispensari­es to open in July 2016 — only one year later, according to the Hawaii Department of Health’s website.

States such as Nevada and Vermont also did not have dispensari­es avail- able from the onset but did allow patients with registry cards to legally grow marijuana for treatment.

“If patients were allowed to cultivate their own medicine (in Maryland), you wouldn’t have pa- tients waiting and suffer- ing,” Liszewski said. “Our organizati­on is trying to get to a solution that has the dispensari­es opening up as soon as possible.”

A 2011 amendment to Vermont’s 2004 medical marijuana legislatio­n establishe­d dispensari­es that are permitted to both cultivate and distribute the drug. In Maryland, growers and dispensari­es must be separate busi- nesses, an extra layer of bureaucrac­y.

The 30 pre-approved growers and processors are in the second stage of the licensing process where they must under- go background checks, inspection­s and prove financial competency.

Preliminar­y, or stage one, approval of dispensari­es is forthcomin­g, according to the commission.

Liszewski said removing statutory and regulatory caps that restrict the number of growers and processors permitted under law could alleviate the grievances regarding geographic diversity and promote greater competitio­n within the industry.

Perry-Crook says the legislatur­e needs to diversify the pool of applicants and review county-level zoning provisions that do not allow growing, processing or vending in commercial areas. She said these provisions restrict patients’ access to marijuana since they may have to travel farther receive it.

“The supply is not going to meet the demand with how things are laid out right now,” Perry-Crook said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States