Marysville Appeal-Democrat

Wolfenbarg­er’s wife ordered to trial

- By Kayla Webster kwebster@tcnpress.com

Rachel Wolfenbarg­er said she didn’t know about her husband’s child pornograph­y collection, or that he’d been secretly filming a minor under the age of 14.

But the Colusa County District Attorney’s Office said there’s evidence proving she knew everything and remained silent.

After a preliminar­y hearing last week, Judge Jeffrey A. Thompson ordered her to stand trial on a charge of felony child endangerme­nt. She will be arraigned on March 21.

The case is related to an investigat­ion involving her husband, William Richard Wolfenbarg­er, arrested in August for allegedly possessing about 4,000 child pornograph­y images on his computer.

While her husband is suspected of engaging in illegal activity, the District Attorney’s Office alleged Rachel Wolfenbarg­er enabled his behavior by not contacting authoritie­s.

Colusa County sheriff’s Sgt. Mark Contreras testified the FBI was able to obtain text messages and videos from February of last year that suggest she was aware of her husband’s infatuatio­n with child pornograph­y.

Contreras read aloud numerous text messages sent to William Wolfenbarg­er from a phone number registered to Rachel Wolfenbarg­er.

One of the messages was: “A lot of the pictures on that site are underage porn. Is that where you spend your time?” Contreras believes the text was referencin­g a Russian website where most of the images on William Wolfenbarg­er’s computer originated.

Contreras said the FBI also found webcam videos in William Wolfenbarg­er’s possession that depicted a minor in a state of undress. Another recovered video, thought to be from a cellphone, shows him installing cameras used to capture footage of the minor. In the same video, a woman believed to be Rachel Wolfenbarg­er commented that what William was doing was “perverted.”

Rachel Wolfenbarg­er’s defense attorney, Sukhraj Pamma, argued the prosecutio­n couldn’t prove it was Rachel Wolfenbarg­er who spoke in the video.

He also referenced text messages sent from Rachel Wolfenbarg­er’s phone that said her husband was not welcome to live with her anymore. Pamma suggested that was the only way Rachel Wolfenbarg­er could reprimand her husband’s child porn addiction, because she was emotionall­y conflicted about calling the police.

Pamma requested that the felony charge be lowered to a misdemeano­r. Thompson denied Pamma’s request.

William Wolfenbarg­er’s next court appearance is March 22.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States