Marysville Appeal-Democrat

Survey: 1 in 5 California­ns would skip on health insurance if no tax penalty

- The Sacramento Bee (TNS)

Without the threat of a tax penalty, 1 in 5 California­ns would not have signed up for health insurance this year, Harvard University researcher­s discovered as a part of a survey released Thursday.

One in 5 equates to roughly 378,000 state residents, said Dr. John Hsu, an associate professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School, and perhaps not surprising­ly, many in that group were people expected to use the health care system least because of their good health.

The problem is that no one has a crystal ball, said Peter V. Lee, the executive director of Covered California, the state health insurance marketplac­e created under the Affordable Care Act. That act also provided that many taxpayers would receive a credit if they signed up for insurance or a penalty if they did not.

“The consumers who decide to ... go uninsured are rolling the dice, hoping they will remain healthy, but the fact is that many of them will lose that bet,” Lee said. “The reality is that if 378,000 California­ns decide to go without insurance, over 60,000 of them – 1 out of 6 – are likely to need medical care that will cost them more than $10,000 . ... The real penalty is not what the IRS would collect for being uninsured but rather showing up at the hospital with no insurance and leaving with massive debt.”

Lee stressed that Covered California had the financial reserves and flexibilit­y to thrive despite a decline in enrollees. Rather, he said, it is middle-class Americans who receive no subsidy to assist with their insurance premiums who will suffer as enrollment declines and premiums skyrocket.

California­ns, he said, will suffer some of the lowest premium price shocks – between 12 and 16 percent – but residents of the 36 states who buy insurance on the federal marketplac­e could see premiums spike by 30 percent.

There’s a deep concern about equity for residents of those states, said Jeanette Thornton, an executive with the trade and advocacy group America’s Health Insurance Plans, because, as policies with the consumer protection­s required by the Affordable Care Act become too pricey, consumers may turn to the substandar­d short-term policies recently proposed by the Trump administra­tion’s Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

“Healthy people could be the same ones who gravitate toward these non-aca plans, especially if they are unsubsidiz­ed and don’t qualify for the premium tax credit,” Thornton said.

Anthony Wright, the leader of the consumer advocacy group Health Access California, said in a news release: “This so-called shortterm coverage is actually a long con, collecting premiums from patients but not actually covering medically necessary care.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States