Marysville Appeal-Democrat

THE OPEN FORUM

-

I write this letter in response to James P. Carter of Marysville, who recently commented on the horrendous statements made by a White House staffer regarding Senator John Mccain.

I cannot help but wonder if Mr. Carter was a gymnast in his younger days. His flexibilit­y – the way he has managed to bend and twist reality, reason, and moral integrity to suit his own political ideology – is nothing short of Olympicwor­thy.

In all my years (admittedly less than 72), I had never seen someone claim, with a straight face, that an individual who commits a heinous and reprehensi­ble act is less culpable, less deserving of scorn, than the person who brings that heinous act to the public’s attention. To me, and to most reasonable folks, that would be unconscion­able. We don’t punish people for telling the truth. And we certainly don’t punish people for telling the truth about objectivel­y immoral acts occurring at the highest levels of our government.

But Mr. Carter is right about one thing: the staffer who said those things about Senator Mccain, a war hero dying from cancer, should absolutely be fired. Now. . . who might have the power to do something like that? Oh, that’s right, the President of the United States. So, by Mr. Carter’s own words, President Trump should have fired this staffer immediatel­y upon hearing what had happened. Is that what occurred? No. Not even close. So what now, Mr. Carter?

From an objectivel­y moral perspectiv­e, here is how the hierarchy of reprehensi­bility should shake out in this situation. In first (worst) place, is the staffer who made the comment. In second place is the President, who refused to hold the staffer accountabl­e for her objectiona­ble behavior by immediatel­y firing her. And in no place, not even making the podium in this race to the moral bottom, is the person who reported the staffer’s reprehensi­ble comment.

But in Mr. Carter’s world, the champion, the one most deserving of our disdain, is the individual who reported the staffer’s comments. Second place goes to the heartless staffer. And in no place, not even making the podium, is the President. Indeed, according to Mr. Carter, the only person capable of holding this staffer accountabl­e for her misdeeds appears to bear no ultimate responsibi­lity.

In life, in law, in a democracy, objectivit­y is important. Without it, we cannot progress as a society because we cannot agree on the basic foundation­al truths upon which more sophistica­ted systems and institutio­ns are built. The loss of objectivit­y is what closes lines of communicat­ion, sows misunderst­anding, and breeds division. It should be avoided at all costs.

It is clear that Mr. Carter has some very strong feelings about the President. But what’s clearer is the fact that Mr. Carter’s ability to be objective has been totally compromise­d by some internal force connected with this administra­tion. Maybe that force is infatuatio­n. Maybe it’s love. Maybe it’s idolatry. Whatever it is, it isn’t healthy.

Brad Westmorela­nd

I highly oppose the new Yuba City garbage transfer station. I live in the vicinity of the new location and WILL NOT put up with any byproducts of this new location!! Someone needs to take a strong hard look at the affects this will have on family’s in and around this location!! From roads to housing values dropping!

You WILL hear from us!

Paul Bryan

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States