Calif. lawmakers OK plan for ‘strongest net neutrality protection’ in nation
California Sen. Scott Wiener (D-san Francisco) reads a list of consumer and open internet advocacy groups who came to Sacramento on May 29 to lobby the Legislature on a netneutrality bill as a Senate deadline looms. Legislators in the state ended a dispute over a proposed net neutrality bill Thursday.
“As internet service providers and media companies like AT&T and Time Warner consolidate, net neutrality is more important than ever,” he added.
Two measures by Wiener and Sen. Kevin de Leon of Los Angeles address concerns over the June 11 decision by the Federal Communications Commission to repeal net neutrality rules approved during the Obama administration.
Without those regulations, internet service providers can slow or block services like online video or calling unless fees are paid, the senator charged.
That, Wiener said, allows internet service providers to limit choice and increase prices, with disproportionate harm falling on low-income residents. To win back Wiener’s support, the agreement restores previously removed provisions to his bill. The compromise legislation would prohibit internet service providers from charging websites fees for faster service while blocking or slowing websites that do not pay extra.
SB 822 also would bar internet service providers from circumventing the rules at the point where data enters their network and from levying access fees to reach internet service customers, officials said.
In addition, providers would have to count the content and websites they own against subscribers’ data caps.
It must be approved by the full Assembly and Senate to be sent to Gov. Jerry Brown for consideration.
De Leon’s SB 460 will focus on requiring internet service providers that have state contracts to comply with the principles of net neutrality.
“In the aftermath of Trump’s destruction of the internet, we are advancing legislation with the strongest net neutrality and consumer protections in the nation,” said Santiago, chairman of the Assembly Committee on Communications and Conveyance.
Santiago said a free and open internet is tied to “the fight for social change and progressive values,” adding, “Citizens United, the Janus decision and now the threat of a Supreme Court nomination under Trump makes this net neutrality legislation more important than ever.”
AT&T representatives, who have opposed both previous versions of the legislation as overreaching, did not provide an immediate comment on the amended bill Thursday.