Marysville Appeal-Democrat

Congress’ $867 billion farm bill is out; here’s what’s in it

Legislatio­n will now head to the House, where it is also expected to pass

- The Washington Post

WASHINGTON – The Senate on Tuesday overwhelmi­ngly approved an $867 billion farm bill as Congress appeared poised to pass legislatio­n that would help an agricultur­e industry battered by President Donald Trump’s trade war.

In an 87-to-13 vote, the Senate approved legislatio­n that would allocate billions of dollars in subsidies to American farmers, legalize hemp, bolster farmers markets, and reject stricter limits on food stamps pushed by House Republican­s.

The legislatio­n will now head to the House, where it is also expected to pass, after lawmakers worked out a House-senate compromise earlier this month. Trump expressed support for the legislatio­n Tuesday and said he expects to sign it into law.

Congressio­nal negotiator­s said they faced increasing pressure to complete the bill from farmers and ranchers who have suffered steep declines in commoditie­s prices amid Trump’s ongoing trade war with China.

“We’ve been trying to point out this is no time for a revolution­ary farm bill,” said Sen. Pat Roberts, R-kan., chairman of the Senate committee on Agricultur­e, Nutrition and Forestry. “It’s time to get a bill done so our farmers have predictabi­lity and certainty during a very difficult time. We just have to do that.”

Agricultur­e Secretary Sonny Perdue expressed support for the legislatio­n in a statement Monday night. “The farm bill is moving along nicely,” Trump said Tuesday during his meeting with congressio­nal Democratic leaders. “We think the

farm bill is in very good shape.”

Still, the bill has faced criticism, including from conservati­ve Republican­s. Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-iowa, one of two farmers in the Senate and a member of the agricultur­e committee, said he would vote against the package over its expansion of federal subsidies to more distant relatives of farmers, such as their cousins, nephews and nieces. Grassley joined eight other Republican­s in opposing the measure, which was supported by every Senate Democrat.

“I’m very disappoint­ed the conferees decided to expand the loopholes on farm subsidies,” said Grassley, adding that he expects the bill to pass over his objections. “I’ve been trying to make sure the people who get the subsidies are real farmers . ... I’ve been trying for three years, and it gets worse and worse and worse.”

The full text of the farm bill was released Monday night. Here’s what’s in and what’s out.

1. Cuts to food stamps are not in the bill. The most controvers­ial element of the farm bill debate has been over difference­s between the House and Senate approaches to food stamps, or the Supplement­al Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

House Republican­s’ farm bill would have forced states to impose work requiremen­ts on people ages 49 to 59 who get food stamps. It would have also forced states to impose work requiremen­ts on parents with children ages 6 to 12, among other changes. One estimate found those proposals could mean that 1.1 million households would face cuts to benefits, although conservati­ves and Republican­s contested those numbers.

The Senate version of the farm bill made none of those changes. The farm bill requires Democratic support to get the 60 votes it needs to pass the Senate, and these cuts are not in the final package, Roberts has confirmed.

Liberal groups have cheered the news. “The negotiator­s appear to have achieved a bipartisan compromise that maintains and modestly strengthen­s SNAP, ensuring that millions of struggling Americans will continue to be able to count on SNAP to help them put food on the table,” Robert Greenstein, president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning think tank, said in a statement.

2. The bill includes SNAP revisions, although they won’t shrink individual benefits. The final bill does include several new changes to the SNAP program, though none will restrict families’ food stamp benefits, according to congressio­nal aides.

Among them is a new National Accuracy Clearingho­use, which would prevent individual­s from receiving food stamp benefits in multiple states. The final farm bill also eliminates an awards program that gave states up to $48 million per year in federal funding for high performanc­es related to program access and payment accuracy.

The projected savings from these changes will be plowed back into food banks and other nutrition assistance programs, aides said.

3. Congress is not binding the White House on food stamps. The Trump administra­tion has signaled its intention to cut food stamps without approval from Congress, and the farm bill does not bind the White House’s hands, according to congressio­nal aides. The Agricultur­e Department has already floated weakening the waivers it gives states to temporaril­y suspend some food stamp work requiremen­ts.

4. Some expanded farm subsidies. The farm bill mirrors at least some provisions in the farm bill passed by House Republican­s, including in expanding some federal agricultur­e subsidies to nieces, nephews and first cousins of farmers – even if those relatives do not directly work on the farm.

The Environmen­tal Working Group, which tracks federal farm subsidies, has criticized this provision as wasteful giveaways to those who don’t contribute significan­t labor to farms. Congressio­nal Republican­s have defended the expansion as helping encourage more people to be involved in farming.

 ??  ??
 ?? Los Angeles Times/tns ?? A farm worker drives a truck that sprays and fans out herbicide on an almond tree farm in a 2015 file image from Modesto.
Los Angeles Times/tns A farm worker drives a truck that sprays and fans out herbicide on an almond tree farm in a 2015 file image from Modesto.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States