Marysville Appeal-Democrat

As Trump attacks election outcome, Americans are less confident in the vote count, USC poll finds

- Los Angeles Times (TNS)

President Donald Trump’s repeated — and baseless — insistence that widespread fraud undermined this month’s presidenti­al election has left a mark on Americans’ faith in the voting process, a postelecti­on USC Dornsife survey has found.

Using a 0-100 scale to measure their confidence that all ballots were tallied correctly, the average ranking from voters was a middling 58. Democrats gave higher marks — 79 — that the vote count was accurate, while Republican­s on the whole rated their confidence in the election results’ accuracy at just 34.

“What’s really very clear is that the large group of voters who voted for Donald Trump in this election have absorbed the message that the vote may not have been completely, fairly counted,” said Jill Darling, the director of the USC Dornsife survey. Democrats, she said, may have lost confidence because of concerns about voter suppressio­n or problems with the U.S. Postal Service.

The final preelectio­n tracking poll estimated a national electoral outcome of Joe Biden with 53% of the popular vote and Trump with 44%. The actual results were a narrower spread: Biden with 51% and Trump getting 47%, with results still being tallied.

“Clearly, we were overestima­ting

Biden a little bit and underestim­ating Trump by a little bit more,” Darling said.

To explain the discrepanc­y, Darling said the USC team has begun to look into whether its probabilit­y questions, in which respondent­s ranked their answers on a scale of 0 to 100, did not work as well this election year or if it was missing any key population of voters. The team’s analysis found that the survey did do a good job of predicting overall likelihood of voting. It also found no evidence that people lied or were inconsiste­nt in their responses.

One possible reason for the polling miss could be the deep polarizati­on in the electorate.

“We used to get a range of what people would say about their likelihood of voting for each candidate. This election, everyone was clustered at either 0 or 100 — yes or no,” Darling said. “The question is: Is that just what the electorate looks like now or are people who are still making up making up their minds a missing piece of the puzzle.”

Other factors that could account for the results could be that young respondent­s tended to overstate their likelihood of voting, some voters stopped participat­ing for the duration of the tracking survey and people who decided their vote on the day of the election slightly favored Trump.

Many other polls this cycle also tended to underrate support for

Trump, raising expectatio­ns for a commanding Biden win coupled with a blue wave of Democratic wins down-ballot. While Biden did receive a record-setting 79 million votes so far, Democrats fell short in key Senate races and lost seats in the House of Representa­tives, although they maintained a majority.

Just before the election, for example, the USC Dornsife poll estimated a double-digit win for Biden. However, a separate question about how voters thought their friends, family and acquaintan­ces may vote pointed to a tighter race — 51% for Biden versus 46% for Trump — that more closely aligned with the true results.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States