California’s universal voting by mail becomes permanent
SACRAMENTO — California’s pandemic-inspired move toward mailing a ballot to every registered, active voter will become a permanent part of the state’s political landscape, an embrace of an extended and flexible voting process instead of the traditional focus on a single day of voting in person.
Gov. Gavin Newsom’s signature Monday on Assembly Bill 37 makes California the eighth state in the nation with a law on the books requiring every voter to be mailed a ballot. The new law is part of an evolution of voting in the state over the last two decades, an effort to provide voters more options for when and where to cast their ballots.
“Data shows that sending everyone a ballot in the mail provides voters access. And when voters get ballots in the mail, they vote,” Democratic Assemblyman Marc Berman of Palo Alto, the bill’s author, said during a Senate committee hearing in July.
The law takes effect in January and will require ballots to be mailed to all voters for statewide elections in June and November. AB 37 also applies to local elections, potentially improving turnout in community contests but also increasing costs, given that voteby-mail ballots are provided with prepaid postage.
The idea of universal mailed ballots has been discussed by state officials and voting rights activists for years, but it’s unclear whether the effort would have succeeded if not for the COVID-19 pandemic. Amid public health concerns about in-person voting, Newsom and lawmakers took temporary action to mail ballots to more than 22 million voters last fall — an election with voter turnout at levels not seen in California for a half-century or more.
“Last year we took unprecedented steps to ensure all voters had the opportunity to cast a ballot during the pandemic and today we are making those measures permanent after record-breaking participation in the 2020 presidential election,” Newsom said in a written statement.
State officials expanded the allmail ballot distribution for the failed effort to recall Newsom from office. Although voter turnout was lower relative to the November presidential election, current returns show more than three-fourths of the ballots were cast remotely. Final results from the recall election are scheduled to be released next month.
The new law largely follows the lead of other states that mail every voter a ballot. But no other state’s effort comes close in size or scope. California has more registered voters than the combined totals in several other states, an electorate that has grown steadily after the enactment of laws that automate registration at the Department of Motor Vehicles and allow eligible Californians to fill out registration forms as late as Election Day.
Remote voting, referred to in the past as absentee voting, is the preferred participation method for most California voters. A majority of the votes in every statewide election over the last decade have been cast somewhere other than a polling place or local voting center.
The trend is even more noticeable in statistics tracking the number of permanent vote-by-mail registrations. In the 2016 presidential election, 51% of the state’s voters had opted into the program; by last November, more than 75% had chosen to forego inperson voting for all future elections.
“Voters like having options for returning their ballot whether by mail, at a secure dropbox, a voting center or at a traditional polling station,” Secretary of State Shirley Weber said in a written statement. “And the more people who participate in elections, the stronger our democracy and the more we have assurance that elections reflect the will of the people of California.”
Opposition to AB 37 during this year’s legislative deliberations was organized by conservative critics of California’s voting laws and operations — criticisms that have been leveled numerous times over the years but were largely not germane to the proposal for mailing all voters a ballot.
One persistent criticism focuses on elections officials’ use of a list of inactive voters, those who may still be eligible to vote but haven’t been reachable at their mailing address on file and who haven’t cast ballots in recent elections. In some situations, inactive registrations are canceled after a voter fails to participate in two consecutive federal elections.
When errors do occur, critics have insisted without any clear evidence that the mistakes are an indicator of larger, systemic problems.