Marysville Appeal-Democrat

Pentagon may not immediatel­y fire vaccine resisters

- Tribune News Service Cq-roll Call

WASHINGTON — Facing criticism that mandates for coronaviru­s vaccinatio­ns could force the Defense Department to fire thousands of civilians, contractor­s and troops, the Biden administra­tion is signaling that vaccine resisters may get more time to comply.

President Joe Biden and administra­tion officials have previously said Pentagon employees and contractor­s have to be vaccinated or face terminatio­n on a series of upcoming deadlines. This has led to fears that thousands of people responsibl­e for national defense may soon be forced out of their jobs. Virtually every day, Republican lawmakers decry what they describe as a national security crisis in the offing.

The deadlines for vaccinatio­n vary, depending on the type of employee. And they have not changed. The first of them arrives next week, on Nov. 2, for activeduty Air Force personnel, and official service figures show that some 4 percent of the activeduty Air Force is still not fully vaccinated.

Three administra­tion officials in the last couple of days have described the deadlines not as the dates when an ax will fall but rather as the start of an education process designed to convince those who are resisting vaccinatio­n to reverse course.

Administra­tion officials seem to be straddling a line — sending a strict signal that the U.S. government will vaccinate its people on the one hand, while reassuring Americans that enforcemen­t will not come so hard and fast as to harm U.S. military readiness or the broader economy.

“U.S. military leaders are sending a tough message to the troops to get it done,” said Mike Hanzel, a civilian attorney who specialize­s in military law. “However, my sense is that their goal here is not to punish or separate large numbers of servicemem­bers, which could be counterpro­ductive to overall readiness, but rather to encourage compliance. In practice, while anyone who failed to get their vaccine is at risk once the deadline passes, I believe most will still have an opportunit­y to get the vaccine and avoid involuntar­y separation.”

TSoft sell

Under a variety of directives, federal government civilians, contractor­s and U.S. military personnel must all be vaccinated as a condition of employment or of receiving contracts, except for those exempted for religious or medical reasons.

The deadlines for people whose work connects them to the Pentagon to get fully vaccinated generally fall in November and December, though Army reservists have until June of next year to get their shots.

While it is clear that terminatio­n of employment is a possible consequenc­e for those who do not comply on schedule, how and when the policy would be enforced is not yet clear.

On Thursday, Stephen Morani, the Pentagon’s acting assistant secretary for sustainmen­t, addressing the Nov. 22 deadline for Defense Department civilians to be fully vaccinated, described the enforcemen­t process as more pedagogica­l than punitive.

“There will be escalation in disciplina­ry actions that will go through a process,” Morani said at a House Armed Services Readiness Subcommitt­ee hearing. “Nobody is going to be fired on the 22nd.

Education is critical in this space — to educate people about the safety of it and the risk of not having it.”

Likewise, Ashish Vazirani, the president’s nominee to be the Pentagon’s deputy under secretary for personnel and readiness, told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday he supports the mandate but believes it will be sensitivel­y enforced.

“It’s my understand­ing that there is an administra­tive process that allows for exemptions, whether they’re medically necessary or due to religious belief, and then progressin­g administra­tive actions to address a servicemem­ber who may decline a vaccine,” Vazirani said, addressing the committee’s top Republican, James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma. “So, senator, if I’m confirmed, I would certainly look towards making sure that those processes are administer­ed with care and compassion, so that we understand the specific needs of each servicemem­ber.”

Inhofe, for his part, said: “I can’t think of anything that would be worse than if we were to find ourselves in a situation where we’re letting people go, we’re firing people.”

The administra­tion’s soft sell of the mandate was also in evidence the day before when Jeff Zients, Biden’s coronaviru­s response coordinato­r, told reporters that most of the deadlines are still a few weeks off and, even then, a process will only have begun.

“But even once we hit those deadlines, we expect federal agencies and contractor­s will follow their standard HR processes and that, for any of the probably relatively small percent of employees that are not in compliance, they’ll go through education, counseling, accommodat­ions, and then enforcemen­t,” Zients said. “So, these processes play out across weeks, not days. And so, to be clear, we’re creating flexibilit­y within the system. We’re offering people multiple opportunit­ies to get vaccinated. There is not a cliff here.”

A Senate GOP aide said Zients’s comments “increase confusion for business owners who will ultimately bear the ramificati­ons of accidental noncomplia­nce. Doublespea­k isn’t good enough: The White House needs to be clear if they’re moving the deadline or not.”

A White House official declined to clarify or elaborate on Zients’s remarks.

P

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States