Marysville Appeal-Democrat

California plans for a pos•-roe world

Abortion access shrinks elsewhere

- Tribune News Service Kaiser Health News

SACRAMENTO — With access to abortion at stake across America, California is preparing to become the nation’s abortion provider.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislativ­e leaders have asked a group of reproducti­ve health experts to propose policies to bolster the state’s abortion infrastruc­ture and ready it for more patients. Lawmakers plan to begin debating the ideas when they reconvene in January.

Abortion clinics are already girding themselves for a surge in demand.

Janet Jacobson, medical director of Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties, said three or four out-of-state patients visit her clinics each day — about double the number that sought treatment before a near-total ban on abortion took effect in Texas in September.

While the nine clinics can absorb that slow trickle, they expect up to 50 out-of-state patients a week if the U.S. Supreme

Court’s conservati­ve majority guts abortion rights nationally, Jacobson said. She bases her estimate on new data from the Guttmacher Institute, a research organizati­on that supports abortion and reproducti­ve health rights.

She is adding staff members and appointmen­t capacity, hoping to accommodat­e everyone.

“We have to make sure we can still continue to care for all of our California patients,” Jacobson said. “We don’t want them getting squeezed out” of appointmen­ts.

The Texas law banned nearly all abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy and empowered private citizens to sue anyone who performs or “aids and abets” an abortion after that time. The Supreme Court heard arguments in that case on Nov. 1 and is expected to announce a ruling on its constituti­onality in June. Nonetheles­s, Florida and Ohio have announced plans for copycat laws.

Next month the high court will hear another abortion case with even broader implicatio­ns, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s

Health Organizati­on, a lawsuit challengin­g the constituti­onality of a 2018 Mississipp­i law that prohibited abortion after 15 weeks. If the court sides with Mississipp­i, its decision could overturn existing abortion rights set by the landmark Roe v. Wade case.

Should that happen, reproducti­ve rights experts predict, 26 states will ban the procedure altogether and states with stronger protection­s for abortion, like California, will draw even more patients. There could be up to a 3,000% increase in people who “may drive to California for abortion care” each year, according to the Guttmacher data.

In 2017, the most recent year for which data is available from Guttmacher, California — by far the nation’s most populous state — had more abortion providers than any other state, with 419 hospitals, clinics or doctors’ offices performing the procedure. The next highest were New York, with 252, and Florida, with 85. Neighborin­g Arizona and Nevada each had 11. Of the 862,320 abortions performed in the U.S. that year, 132,680, about 15%, were in California.

Planned Parenthood clinics in California say they already serve about 7,000 out-of-state patients a year and are expecting a surge of new ones, especially in travel hubs like the Los Angeles area.

In September, Planned Parenthood and groups such as Black Women for Wellness convened the California Future of Abortion Council with backing from influentia­l Democratic leaders including Newsom, state Senate leader Toni Atkins and Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon.

Atkins, who was the director of a San Diego women’s health clinic in the 1980s, said she spent time with women from states where it was hard to get an abortion. She said California is committed to ensuring abortion access in the state and beyond.

The council is focused on increasing funding for abortion services, providing logistical and financial help for women who need to travel, increasing the number of health care providers who perform abortions and strengthen­ing legal protection­s for them.

Increasing capacity could mean licensing more practition­ers to provide abortions or pumping more resources into telehealth so people can see a doctor online to prescribe pills for a medical abortion — a service California doctors currently can provide to patients only in California.

The most important thing the state should do is fix its shortage of providers, especially those who perform second-trimester abortions, which are more expensive and complicate­d than first-trimester abortions, said council member Dr. Daniel Grossman, director of the Advancing New Standards in Reproducti­ve Health program at the University of California-san Francisco.

It’s not feasible to place an abortion provider in every corner of the state, Grossman said. Instead, the council should focus on creating “hubs that can provide abortion care for large numbers of people” in easy-to-get-to locations.

California already struggles to provide abortions to all who seek them, especially low-income women covered by Medi-cal, California’s Medicaid program.

For example, 28 counties — home to 10% of Medi-cal recipients of childbeari­ng age — don’t have facilities that provide abortions to Medi-cal patients.

A medical abortion, in which pills are used to terminate a pregnancy, costs California patients an average of $306 out-ofpocket, according to an analysis by the California Health Benefits Review Program, but isn’t available after 10 weeks. After that, the only option is a surgical abortion, which costs an average of $887 out-of-pocket in California.

One of the council’s recommenda­tions will likely be to increase the rate Medi-cal pays for abortions so more providers will perform them, said council member Fabiola Carrión, interim director for reproducti­ve and sexual health at the National Health Law Program.

Medi-cal pays $354.43 for a second-trimester abortion. A 2020 study in the journal Contracept­ion found that states paid between $79 and $626 for a second-trimester abortion in 2017.

Increasing Medi-cal rates won’t help patients traveling from outside California. Generally, private insurance doesn’t cover out-of-state abortions, so most women will be on the hook for the full cost, and those enrolled in other states’ Medicaid programs must pay out-of-pocket, too.

The council hopes to reduce costs for state residents and visitors, said Brandon Richards, director of communicat­ions for Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California. “It’s about making it easy for people to access abortion in California, whether they reside here or are coming in from out of state,” he said.

 ?? Tribune News Service/getty Images ?? People participat­e in an abortion rights rally outside of the Supreme Court on March 4, 2020 in Washington, D.C.
Tribune News Service/getty Images People participat­e in an abortion rights rally outside of the Supreme Court on March 4, 2020 in Washington, D.C.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States