Marysville Appeal-Democrat

Cole eyes axing earmarks for nonprofits

- By Aidan Quigley Cq-roll Call

WASHINGTON —

House Republican­s are weighing a change to their congressio­nal earmark guidelines that would put another major dent in House lawmakers’ ability to secure funding for social services programs in their districts, sources familiar with the discussion­s said.

New House Appropriat­ions Chairman Tom Cole, R-okla., is considerin­g blocking nonprofits from receiving earmarks under the Department of Housing and Urban Developmen­t’s Economic Developmen­t Initiative grant program.

So-called EDIS, which receive grants out of HUD’S Community Developmen­t Fund, accounted for the largest single source of earmarks in fiscal 2024 at nearly $3.3 billion. The HUD projects grew in popularity with House lawmakers last year particular­ly after thenhouse Appropriat­ions Chairwoman Kay Granger, R-texas, banned Laborhhs-education earmarks entirely from her chamber’s bill.

No decisions have been made, though Cole has said fiscal 2025 earmark guidance would be unveiled soon.

There were $2.2 billion in House-originated EDI earmarks in the final fiscal 2024 spending package including the Transporta­tion-hud bill last year, CQ Roll Call found. House members secured EDI funding for nonprofits ranging from shelters for victims of domestic violence, to food banks, to Habitat for Humanity grants to build homes for those in need, among others.

In all, roughly $800 million of the EDI funding went to nonprofits, give or take, representi­ng a hefty chunk that could get the ax this year under Cole’s leadership. The remainder went to cities, counties and other local government agencies as well as colleges and universiti­es.

Nonprofit community projects skewed toward the Democratic side of the aisle in fiscal 2024, but numerous House Republican­s were also willing participan­ts.

The largest single Houseorigi­nated EDI project was a $9 million set-aside for a homeless shelter in Bakersfiel­d, Calif., requested by California

Rep. David Valadao, the new top Republican on the Legislativ­e

Branch Appropriat­ions Subcommitt­ee. He’s got one of the toughest races of any GOP incumbent this year; Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales rates Valadao’s seat Tilt Republican.

Other sizable House GOP nonprofit HUD earmarks in the fiscal 2024 package include nearly $3.8 million for the Greater Somerset County YMCA in New Jersey, requested by Thomas H. Kean Jr., R-N.J., and almost $2.4 million for Angels of Love, a Mclaren, Texas nonprofit focused on aiding women and children who are victims of domestic violence. Monica De La Cruz, R-texas, requested that project.

Kean’s race is rated Tilt Republican, while De La Cruz’s is Lean Republican.

Senate appropriat­ors, who allow lawmakers in that chamber to earmark the Labor-hhs-education bill, had fewer earmarked dollars in the HUD account, originatin­g a total of $1.1 billion in EDI earmarks.

‘Political’ projects

Cole has vowed to try to limit the number of “political” projects following some controvers­ies during the last cycle, specifical­ly about earmarks supporting the LGBTQ community in the Transporta­tion-hud and Labor-hhs-education bills.

“Some of these are unobjectio­nable, some of them create political problems for people,” Cole said this week. “That’s just the reality of it. I shouldn’t have to have a political problem in my district because I voted for a bill that had your earmark in it.”

It’s not exactly clear if there would be exemptions to the ban, though sources say Republican­s are considerin­g allowing colleges and universiti­es to continue to receive earmarks under the program. Local government­s and Native American reservatio­ns are not expected to be affected by the potential change.

Last summer, House Republican­s took the unusual step of stripping $3.6 million for projects that Democrats submitted that would benefit LGBTQ community from the initial Transporta­tion-hud bill.

Ultimately one of those earmarks made it back into the final Labor-hhseducati­on bill due to Senate backing, but Democrats are on guard for any further tweaks to the process. House Appropriat­ions ranking member Rosa Delauro said Tuesday that any changes that would block funding for Lgbtqrelat­ed projects “can’t fly.”

“How do you continue when you so politicize a process?” Delauro said. “Should we now start to go through every project on the Republican side? We agree with this, we don’t agree with that, we agree with this? Hell no.”

Delauro, D-conn., said she did not expect Cole to pursue changes along these lines.

And even if House Republican­s do further limit the projects that Democrats can request, Senate Democrats are unlikely to go along.

The Senate allows earmarking of the Laborhhs-education bill, and will continue to allow funding for EDI earmarks for nonprofits in the Transporta­tion-hud measure for fiscal 2025. Senate appropriat­ors released their updated earmark guidance on Wednesday.

During fiscal 2024, House Labor-hhs-education Appropriat­ions Chairman Robert B. Aderholt, R-ala., voted against the final package due to Senate earmarks for LGBTQ programs and hospitals that perform abortions, along with other earmarks he found objectiona­ble.

“We got rid of all of our poison riders, and Schumer wouldn’t agree to take away their poisonous earmarks,” Aderholt said at the time, referring to Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States