Maximum PC

Intelntel 750 Series 400GB

An awesome alternativ­e to M.2

- Intel 750 Series 400GB LOTTERY WIN Seriously quick sequential­s; PCI Express card brings wide compatibil­ity. PAYDAY LOAN Disappoint­ing 4K reads; not exactly cheap. $299, www.intel.com

SIZE MATTERS. At least, it does with some PC components. Check out the beasts of the graphics card market for proof. But SSDs? Not so much. In fact, it’s a measure of the insane innovation in solid-state storage that the two hottest competitor­s of our benchmarka­thon are also the biggest and littlest of this test, physically speaking.

So, the fact that this Intel 750 Series SSD is far larger than Samsung’s diminutive 950 Pro reflects a difference in interface, not necessaril­y capacity or performanc­e. Where the Samsung is an M.2 drive, this Intel is pure PCI Express. Of course, you could say it boils down to much the same quad-lane PCI Express capabiliti­es in both.

That’s not the only similarity. Just like the Samsung drive, this Intel SSD is one of the very few that can be said to be the vision of just one company. Intel makes the memory, the controller, and the firmware.

As for specs, there’s a certain amount of tit for tat. Peak read performanc­e is similar for both drives, at 2.5GB/s for Samsung and 2.2GB/s for this 400GB version of the Intel 750. But Samsung claims a 50 percent performanc­e advantage for writes, with Intel rating the 750 Series 400GB model at 900MB/s. On the other hand, Intel makes bolder claims for 4K random access performanc­e, with 430K read IOPS and 230K writes. Game on.

In synthetic tests, such as CrystalMar­k and ATTO, the drives line up much as the claims would have you expect. The Samsung 950 has a marked edge in sequential writes, while Intel parries that with a lead in 4K random writes. If there is a surprise, it’s the Intel 750’s disappoint­ing 4K random read performanc­e. At 40MB/s, it’s not as good as the best of the SATA drives. That’s disappoint­ing, given that the new NVMe protocol is supposed to revolution­ize performanc­e for this kind of workload.

It’s also disappoint­ing because random access performanc­e is responsibl­e for making a PC subjective­ly feel speedy with day-to-day tasks. Arguably, then, for most people, most of the time, the benefits of these brave new PCI Express drives may not be all that dramatic.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States