Maximum PC

Acer ET430K

IPS visuals on a truly epic scale

- –JEREMY LAIRD

IT IS A TRUTH universall­y acknowledg­ed that a monitor is the best long-term investment you can make for your PC. Or it used to be. Go back a decade, and the greatest flat panel was Dell’s 3007, a 30-inch beast with what was then a monster native resolution of 2560x1600, and a quality IPS panel.

It wasn’t cheap. But for the next seven or eight years, little arrived to truly usurp it. Sure, incrementa­l advances were made. But short of spending mega bucks on something really exotic, the 3007 remained a premium experience. That was true until two to three years ago, when the 4K revolution arrived, and suddenly 2560x1600 was old news. Meanwhile, further new features such as adaptive sync, high refresh rates of 120Hz-plus, and HDR tech have upped the ante in terms of image quality beyond mere pixel count.

Does the same logic apply today? Do PC monitors still make good long-term investment­s? Enter the Acer ET430K. The headline stats involve a full 4K res, thus 3840x2160 pixels spread out across 43 diagonal inches. Critically, it also offers IPS panel technology. In this part of the market, the 40-inch-plus space, it’s common to find panels pinched from HDTVs. That often means VA rather than IPS panels.

VA has advantages that map well to HDTV use, including strong contrast and heightened color saturation. The downsides are reduced accuracy, mediocre pixel response, and good, rather than great, viewing angles. Straight out of the box, this new Acer impresses with its sense of control and accuracy. It’s not going to worry a true pro panel for accuracy or color space capability, but it feels like a PC monitor, not an over-saturated HDTV in drag.

Detailed impression­s of image quality are good, too. The viewing angles are nice and broad, there’s plenty of detail in white scales, and gradients are rendered very smoothly. At factory default calibratio­n, there is some mild compressio­n in darker tones, but it’s probably only of concern to content creation pros. Likewise, pixel response is acceptable, if not spectacula­r, and there’s little by way of input lag in subjective terms, both of which make the ET430K a decent gaming propositio­n, so long as you’re happy to do so at 60Hz refresh rate. The response and silky-smooth thrills of 120Hz-plus are not available here.

If there is a visual demerit to note, it involves a difficult to describe form of panel interferen­ce, in which large elements on the screen create visible vertical artefacts above and below. The ET430K only suffers very slightly from this. It’s much more apparent on some older panels in the 40-inch-plus 4K class. For the record, while we’re talking 40-inch monitors, you won’t notice the difference in terms of the pixel pitch of this 43-inch model versus 40-inch 4K monitors. The pixels here are indeed slightly larger on paper, and for those who appreciate the crispness that comes from tight pixel pitches, that’s a worry. In practice, it won’t bother you.

Factor in some nice industrial design, including slim bezels and understate­d but polished styling, and you have a very strong package. Admittedly, it’s unlikely to stand the test of time like that old Dell. It won’t be long before 4K plus 120Hz refresh becomes widely available. 8K resolution­s aren’t far off, either. But at sub-$600, the ET430K is actually relatively affordable. So, Acer’s new 43-inch effort might not quite make for a decade-long investment, but it’s probably one of the best big-format 4K monitors on the market for anything close to this kind of money.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States