Miami Herald (Sunday)

Changing Florida Constituti­on should be hard, but not as hard as shadowy special interests want it to be

- BY CARL HIAASEN chiaasen@miamiheral­d.com

Imagine enduring two separate, soul-sucking election campaigns to choose a president. Instead of voting once, we’d all have to go out and vote twice.

Ridiculous, right? Cruel and unusual punishment.

But a two-vote requiremen­t is exactly what’s being proposed by a mystery group that wants to make it harder for Floridians to amend the state Constituti­on. It’s on your ballot this year as Amendment 4, one of the more rancid upwellings from the Tallahasse­e swamp.

As our law now stands, it’s not easy to change the Constituti­on by citizen initiative — and it shouldn’t be. Amendments begin with a petition drive requiring the number of signatures equal to 8 percent of the votes cast in the previous presidenti­al election.

Those signatures must come from at least half of the state’s 27 congressio­nal districts. Once approved for the ballot, no amendment passes in Florida without at least 60 percent of the voters saying Yes.

Yet now a well-funded shadow group calling itself Keep Our Constituti­on Clean is pushing an amendment designed (ironically) to cripple the amendment process: Floridians would be forced to go to the polls twice to vote on the same initiative, in different elections up to a year apart.

The organizati­on has raised about $9 million in cash and in-kind contributi­ons, but it won’t say where the money came from. One solid guess is the major utility companies, which feared a proposed amendment that would have made the industry more competitiv­e.

There’s nothing more suspicious than a political campaign that absolutely nobody will admit to funding, and that’s Amendment 4.

A traditiona­l function of the Constituti­on is to give citizens their say when lawmakers ignore them on major issues. In recent years, Floridians have done that twice dramatical­ly, to the jaw-grinding annoyance of politician­s in power.

Six years ago, a historic 75 percent of voters approved Amendment 1, a measure meant to “acquire, restore, improve, and manage” conservati­on lands, including forests and Everglades wetlands. The purchases were to be made by the Land Acquisitio­n Trust Fund using 33 percent of the existing tax on real-estate documentar­y stamps.

Voters could not have more emphatical­ly declared their support for preserving critical wild places — and no sooner had the amendment passed than the Republican-led Legislatur­e conspired to subvert it.

Having already gutted the Forever Florida land program, lawmakers had no intention of re-starting a conservati­on plan. Instead, they began spending the Amendment 1 money on agency expenses, staff salaries, even computer software upgrades — anything except buying land, which is what the people had wanted.

Environmen­tal groups sued, won in a Leon County court — and then lost on appeal.

The same fate awaited another now-famous Amendment 4, which was supposed to restore the voting rights of felons who’ve finished their prison terms. It passed in 2018 with 65 percent voter approval, but we all know what happened next.

Gov. Ron DeSantis and GOP leaders rammed through a law saying felons couldn’t go to the polls until they paid off all outstandin­g court fees and debts. DeSantis’ mission was to block the votes of hundreds of thousands of eligible felons, many of whom are Black and Hispanic, and presumed to favor Democratic candidates.

Opponents sued, calling the law a “poll tax.” A U.S. district court judge agreed, but his ruling was reversed on appeal.

An estimated 775,000 former inmates were affected by that decision. About 67,000 were able to register in time for the

Nov. 3 election. Some of those who paid their court debts were aided by benefactor­s such as Michael Bloomberg and LeBron James.

The Amendment 4 on this year’s ballot is another suppressio­n plot, less overt but still smelly enough that its $9 million donors want to remain unidentifi­ed and untainted.

However, the Keep Our Constituti­on Clean political action committee has clear connection­s to law firms and a PR agency that work for Florida Power & Light, Gulf Power and other utilities.

Sarah Bascom, a spokespers­on for the PAC, did the same job for the power industry in 2016 when it bankrolled a deceptivel­y worded amendment that would have restricted access to residentia­l solar energy.

Floridians didn’t fall for it then, and this year’s Amendment 4 deserves the same blistering rejection.

Making people go to the polls twice to pass a constituti­onal revision would be an outrageous perversion of the document itself, another move by contemptuo­us special interests to obstruct people from participat­ing in their own democracy.

 ?? Getty Images ?? An amendment on Florida’s ballot would require two separate elections to amend the state constituti­on by citizens’ initiative.
Getty Images An amendment on Florida’s ballot would require two separate elections to amend the state constituti­on by citizens’ initiative.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States