Miami Herald (Sunday)

Florida felons’ votes weren’t decisive in election results

Fears that the eligibilit­y of Florida’s newly enfranchis­ed felons could be called into question in a tight statewide election outcome weren’t realized because President Trump won decisively.

- BY LAWRENCE MOWER lmower@miamiheral­d.com Herald/Times Tallahasse­e Bureau

TALLAHASSE­E

Heading into Tuesday, many were bracing for a razor-thin election in Florida like the ones in 2018 and 2000.

And if that were the case, some feared that the eligibilit­y of Florida’s newly enfranchis­ed felons could be called into question. Thousands could have cast votes despite owing court fees and fines; a controvers­ial 2019 law passed by GOP lawmakers required that those fees and fines had to be paid first.

Of course, neither happened. President Donald Trump won the state by more than 370,000 votes, or 3.5 percentage points — a blowout by Florida standards.

And the people who helped register felons, also called “returning citizens,” are feeling relieved.

“We’re happy that the returning citizen experience this election cycle was one of celebratio­n and not one filled with acrimony and partisansh­ip,” said Neil Volz, deputy director of the Florida Rights Restoratio­n Coalition, whose voting rights were also restored last year.

Volz and the coalition were instrument­al in helping pass a 2018 ballot measure known as Amendment 4, which overturned the state’s 150-year-old ban on voting for people with felony conviction­s. Florida was the last large state to disenfranc­hise people with felony conviction­s, and its passage was celebrated as the nation’s greatest expansion of voting rights in

decades.

Since Amendment 4 passed in November 2018, 80,000 people with felony conviction­s have registered to vote, according to the coalition.

Of those people, the group estimates that 50,000 voted in the general election, a turnout rate just over 62%. That would be much higher than felon turnout rates in the past. The state is not expected to release public data on who voted until next month.

Many of those 50,000 were voting in a general election for the first time in their lives, Volz said.

“Our folks were willing to run through a brick wall to vote,” he said. “We could feel that excitement and see that excitement.”

FEWER REGISTER TO VOTE THAN EXPECTED

The overall number of people with felony conviction­s who registered to vote was much lower than what the coalition’s leader, Desmond Meade, was hoping for. When Amendment 4 passed, he was hoping for between 10% and 20% of the estimated 1.4 million Floridians with felony conviction­s to register to vote.

A investigat­ion by the Tampa Bay Times/Miami Herald and ProPublica found that a law signed last year by Gov. Ron DeSantis tamped down those expectatio­ns. Amendment 4 restored the right to vote to nearly all felons who completed “all terms” of their sentence, but “all terms” were never defined.

DeSantis and GOP lawmakers defined it to require felons pay off all court fees, fines and restitutio­n to victims before voting, even though an estimated 80% of people with felony conviction­s can’t afford to ever pay off those debts or pay them off in monthly installmen­ts.

The law sparked more than a year of federal litigation, and while the lawsuit wound its way through the courts, the state did not remove felons from the rolls who owed court debts. An analysis by a Georgetown Law professor found that as many as 78% of people with felony conviction­s on the rolls owed court fees or fines.

If the election was close, some feared that either party might try to invalidate the votes of felons who owed court debts. That has happened in previous elections in Florida, including in 2016, when the Putnam County sheriff’s race was challenged after felons were found to have voted. A judge dismissed the challenge.

LOOKING AT INELIGIBLE VOTERS ON THE ROLLS

Secretary of State Laurel Lee, who oversees the Division of Elections, said the state is moving ahead on its plan to remove ineligible felons from the rolls, but none of the removals were expected before Election Day.

Previous studies of voter turnout rates among people with felony conviction­s have found that only about 10% who are registered actually vote. A study by Harvard doctoral candidate Michael Morse found that just 11% of the roughly 150,000 people who had their voting rights restored by former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist cast ballots in the 2016 general election, for example.

If the coalition’s estimate that about 62% of felons voted turns out to be true, it would not be that surprising, said Chris Uggen, a professor of sociology and law at the University of Minnesota and one of the few people who has studied voter participat­ion among people with felony conviction­s.

“I would not be surprised if this is quite a bit higher than a state like Minnesota, where there hasn’t been any targeted outreach,” he said.

In Florida, several groups, including the League of Women Voters, tried to contact tens of thousands of people with felony conviction­s they believed didn’t owe any court debts. They made phone calls, sent text messages, and mailed personaliz­ed postcards.

Uggen also credited the Rights Restoratio­n Coalition for generating a national discussion about voting rights and helping break down stigmas about people with felony conviction­s.

“I think the rights restoratio­n groups in Florida can really feel good about the work they’ve done,” he said. “It’s been a powerful movement and a powerful reform effort.”

 ?? JOSE A IGLESIAS jiglesias@elnuevoher­ald.com ?? Desmond Meade, executive director of The Florida Rights Restoratio­n Coalition, speaks outside the Miami-Dade criminal courthouse in Miami on Oct. 2.
JOSE A IGLESIAS jiglesias@elnuevoher­ald.com Desmond Meade, executive director of The Florida Rights Restoratio­n Coalition, speaks outside the Miami-Dade criminal courthouse in Miami on Oct. 2.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States