Miami Herald (Sunday)

In Opa-locka, a ‘war’ between mayor and manager is complicati­ng the city’s recovery

- BY AARON LEIBOWITZ aleibowitz@miamiheral­d.com

An escalating power struggle between the mayor and city manager of Opa-locka has burst into public view, exposing internal strife in a city that has been fighting for its financial life since 2016.

In recent months, City Manager John Pate has accused Mayor Matthew Pigatt of tampering with the city’s police chief search and joining with a nonprofit deep in debt to the city to file a complaint against him with the American Civil Liberties Union.

Pigatt has raised concerns about Pate’s conduct and accused the manager of withholdin­g basic informatio­n about crucial city business. He’s suggested that Pate — who has applied for jobs elsewhere — is laying the groundwork to sue the city.

Things have grown so tense that Pate stripped Pigatt of his administra­tive privileges on the city’s Zoom video conferenci­ng account, and both have said they are no longer comfortabl­e meeting one-on-one with the other. In emails copied to the entire commission, Pate has reminded Pigatt that it’s the manager who runs city operations, not the mayor.

“It seems like this situation has been brewing for months now, the war between you and the manager,” Commission­er John Taylor told Pigatt during a March 4 virtual commission meeting. “If we’re gonna move forward, then we’ve got to work together.”

Pigatt and Pate are both part of a new, young crop of leaders in Opa-locka who have been working to stabilize the northwest Miami-Dade city. Opalocka has been under state financial oversight for almost five years after nearly going bankrupt amid widespread corruption. Multiple city officials were indicted.

Amid the chaos, Pigatt, 34, won a commission seat in 2016, pledging reform and transparen­cy. He became mayor in 2018 on a similar platform, defeating legacy politician­s as four newcomers joined the five-member commission.

Pate, 37, was hired in late 2019, bringing an outsider’s perspectiv­e to City Hall after four years running village operations in University Park, Illinois. Pate received a four-year contract, with Pigatt’s support.

Since then, Opa-locka has been catching up on overdue financial audits, submitting a five-year plan to the state, and reviewing its operations to address a list of 99 findings of mismanagem­ent laid out by Florida’s auditor general in a scathing 2019 report.

But behind the scenes, the relationsh­ip between Pigatt and Pate has become increasing­ly strained. The tensions, according to emails obtained by the Miami Herald and public statements by both officials, stem from disagreeme­nts over their respective authority within the city’s strongmana­ger form of government.

The manager is the city’s CEO, making hiring and firing decisions and overseeing day-to-day operations. The mayor is the highest-ranking member of the city commission, which makes policy and sets the budget.

Pate claims Pigatt has improperly tried to influence the city’s operations and politicize­d decisions that should be apolitical.

“Early on in my career here, all I did was try to protect you from ethics violations,” Pate said to Pigatt during the March 4 commission meeting. “I told you I felt you placed me in a hostile work environmen­t on multiple occasions.”

But Pigatt says he has simply asked tough questions to ensure the city moves forward. He says the manager has stonewalle­d him in seeking basic informatio­n.

“I got elected when this city was not right on many levels,” Pigatt said. “It was because of people not asking questions, people not holding management accountabl­e.”

One example of the feud played out in January, when Pigatt made a public records request for a report about the city’s search for a new police chief, a role that opened up last summer when Pate fired Chief James Dobson.

Pate replied to the mayor’s request in an email, saying he saw it as a “bullying tactic” by the mayor to ensure his favored candidate was considered.

“The final selection to pick the Chief of Police is mine and mine alone,” Pate wrote on Jan. 4. “I will also copy the entire City Commission on this email, so they realize that a perceived ethics violations may be occurring.”

Pigatt responded to Pate the next day, denying that he was trying to sway the process. Pigatt said he had been asking “for months” for updates on the search.

“To date, despite multiple requests, you have refused to provide basic informatio­n,” Pigatt wrote. “As a resident, let alone City official, it is extremely disappoint­ing I have to submit a public records request for informatio­n that should have been provided just to keep the citizens informed.”

A LOCAL NONPROFIT’S ROLE ADDS TO TENSION

The latest twist in the feud between Pate and Pigatt involves two unlikely third parties: the Opa-locka Community Developmen­t Corporatio­n, which provides crucial affordable housing in a city where 41% of residents live in poverty, and the ACLU, which is dedicated to defending civil liberties.

On March 3, a cooperatin­g attorney with the Greater Miami Chapter of the ACLU, Kevin Fitzmauric­e, emailed a woman who had contacted the mayor and manager about her ideas to improve the operations of the city’s building department. Fitzmauric­e said “the mayor and a local CDC” had raised concerns that the woman was being prevented from communicat­ing with the city government, and “passed along this issue to the ACLU.”

The attorney appeared to be referring to an email exchange in late February involving the woman, the city manager and the mayor, in which Pate emphasized that the mayor should be kept out of their conversati­ons to avoid any ethical issues.

“As you may be aware, Opa-locka’s form of government is strong Manager, weak Mayor as the Mayor is only one vote on the City Commission and is only recognized as the ceremonial head of the city,” Pate wrote on Feb. 22.

After receiving the email from the ACLU, the woman forwarded it to Pate and an assistant city manager, telling them she had “no idea” what it was about.

Pate then shared the email with the mayor and city commission­ers, denying that he prevented the woman from communicat­ing with the city and saying he had met with her. The incident, he added, was “a great example of the division being caused by the Mayor and the CDC.”

At the city commission meeting last week, Pigatt denied reaching out to the ACLU and said “people within the Opa-locka CDC” had “made their own inquiries.”

Benjamin Waxman, an ACLU Miami Chapter board member and attorney, said in a statement that informatio­n about who reached out to the organizati­on “is a confidenti­al communicat­ion that we are not permitted to reveal.” (Fitzmauric­e’s email became a public record once it was shared with city officials.)

The Community Developmen­t Corporatio­n’s

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States