Live music is returning to Miami’s stages to provide relief, consolation and joy

than it is right now.

Amplified sound, though, is different from acoustic music. Consider the example of John Philip Sousa’s famous march “Stars and Stripes Forever.” While it will always be rousing and catchy, the effect is different if played by a car radio than if played by a live, 100-person marching band. That feeling — making music with a musician you’re listening to — is a unique communal bond. When you’re in the room with live musicians, you are part of the music.

My 426-day live-music fast broke on May 11, 2021, when my vaccinated Seraphic Fire colleagues and I rehearsed Mozart’s “Ave verum” in a Coral Gables music hall. From the moment the music started, feelings of harmony, of melody, of rhythm and pitch immediately returned. It wasn’t as good as before the pandemic: It was so much better.

This week, my colleagues at Seraphic Fire return to making music in front of a live audience with a piece written in 1736 by the dying 26-year-old composer Giovanni Battista Pergolesi. Contending with a mortal bout of tuberculosis and a broken heart, Pergolesi penned a setting of the “Stabat mater,” found so moving by its first audience that it has been in continuous performance for the past 285 years.

We are but one of hundreds of musical organizations returning to performing this fall. If you find yourself unmoved by your Spotify playlist or by the music coming out of your computer speakers, give live music a try. You might be surprised just how much you’ve missed it.

Patrick Dupré Quigley is founder and artistic director of Seraphic Fire, Miami’s multi-GRAMMY®-no minated vocal ensemble. Seraphic Fire returns to the concert stage, after an absence of 20 months, Nov. 4-7, with “Immortal Genius: Pergolesi’s Stabat Mater.” Go to SeraphicFire.org or call (305) 285-9060 for more information.

Everyone has been talking about the “Big Quit” movement sweeping across the United States and beyond. Experts are grappling with statistics showing record-breaking labor shortages — from Amazon warehouse floors to centers of the care and knowledge economy.

For centuries, work has been at the heart of how the vast majority of us measure our worth — as citizens and as human beings. Today, it is the ticket to survival in 21stcentury America.

For the first time in recent memory, workers are wresting back some of their power as employers struggle to fill vacancies and devise new methods to entice people back to work. Could this be the end of corporate exploitation, bad bosses, long and thankless hours and the beginning of something new? A new form of “freedom?”

As a historical sociologist of labor, I believe this is a crucial moment for reflection. What exactly are we running toward? Is the solution to the ills of modern work to go out on our own? What lessons can history teach us?

After slavery was abolished in the 19th century, ex-slaves, migrants and the working classes were all told to cherish their “freedom” — but they quickly learned that freedom meant work. Productivity became central to the human endeavor, the gold standard for personal flourishing and social progress.

The free-labor contract, too, became the law of civilized nations. No longer could individuals be coerced, bound or whipped into work. The age of consent had arrived. Yet, what did this mean when to survive was to — voluntarily — sign away all waking hours to the factory, mine or plantation owner?

Workers found some relief in the 20th-century social contract with the welfare state — due in large part to the victories of organized labor. But since the 1980s, the state has rolled back many of these protections, leaving it to the private sector to provide — in the name of the “free” market.

Benefits and social protections needed to survive in modern America are now, more than ever, tied to the traditional work relationship. Quietly, corporations have increasingly opted for leaner subcontracting and temporary work arrangements — in the name of flexibility.

The “Great Resignation” signals a collective realization that there is a serious problem with work. Many people simply are not returning to traditional jobs at all. A record number of women have been forced out of the job market — exposing a glaring rift between the social vs. the economic “value” of care work.

For others, mental health now trumps the relentless pursuit of a career. Still, others have simply reached their limit with employers that prioritize profit and gain over their people. Everyone — from Trevor Noah to Robert Reich — has been offering up explanations as to why people are quitting.

But beyond working from home, what does this demand for “flexible” work really look like?

Trends indicate that many are opting for the autonomy of entrepreneurism, freelance, contract or gig work. This move is being celebrated as the “Great Contingency” — a new era of freedom and flexibility. After a grueling 18 months, these flexible work arrangements seem more alluring than ever. In response, companies are already contemplating part-time contracts and freelancers as a permanent hiring model.

We must be cautious about jumping too quickly into this new era of autonomy and self-dependence.

Who will be there to catch us when we fall?

The economically secure can pump social and financial capital into new startups, fall back on savings and flit between opportunities — but do we all have this luxury? History shows us that freedom comes with new risks.

Study after study has warned us of the decreased earnings and growing insecurity of gig work, as the most economically marginalized are barely earning a minimum wage.

The “Great Resignation” could be a golden opportunity — a chance to radically transform the central place of work in our lives. But are we marching headlong off a cliff — voluntarily opting out of the lifelines provided by the employment relationship, no matter how problematic?

If this trend continues, this could be a mass flight into precarity. Many are caught between a rock and a hard place. We must tread carefully, demanding new ways to live economically secure lives — while resisting the urge to blindly follow the siren song of freedom.

Mishal Khan, Ph.D., is a social scientist with a focus on the regulation of labor after slavery across the globe and how these shifts affect the future of work. ©2021 Chicago

Tribune