Miami Herald

YouTube to remove thousands of videos pushing extreme views

- BY KEVIN ROOSE AND KATE CONGER The New York Times

YouTube announced plans Wednesday to remove thousands of videos and channels that advocate for neo-Nazism, white supremacy, and other bigoted ideologies.

In an attempt to clean up extremism and hate speech on its service, YouTube’s new policy will ban “videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify discrimina­tion, segregatio­n or exclusion,” the company said in a blog post. The prohibitio­n will also cover videos denying that violent incidents, like the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticu­t, took place.

YouTube did not name any specific channels or videos that would be banned.

“It’s our responsibi­lity to protect that, and prevent our platform from being used to incite hatred, harassment, discrimina­tion and violence,” the company said in the blog post.

The decision by YouTube, which is owned by Google, is the latest action by a Silicon Valley company to stem the spread of hate speech and disinforma­tion on its site. A month ago, Facebook evicted seven of its most controvers­ial users, including Alex Jones, the conspiracy theorist and founder of InfoWars. Twitter banned Jones last year.

The companies have come under intense criticism for their delayed reaction to the spread of hateful and false content. At the same time, President Donald Trump and others argue that the giant tech platforms censor rightwing opinions, and the new policies put in place by the companies have inflamed those debates.

The tension was evident Tuesday, when YouTube said that a right-wing creator who used racial language and homophobic slurs to harass a journalist in videos on YouTube did not violate its policies. The decision set off a firestorm online, including accusation­s that YouTube was giving a free pass to some of its popular creators.

In the videos, that creator, Steven Crowder, a conservati­ve commentato­r with nearly 4 million YouTube subscriber­s, repeatedly insulted Carlos Maza, a journalist from Vox. Crowder used slurs about Maza’s CubanAmeri­can ethnicity and sexual orientatio­n. Crowder said his comments were harmless, and YouTube determined they did not break its rules.

“Opinions can be deeply offensive, but if they don’t violate our policies, they’ll remain on our site,” YouTube said in a statement about its decision on Crowder.

The back-to-back decisions illustrate­d a central theme that has defined the moderation struggles of socialmedi­a companies: Making rules is often easier than enforcing them.

“This is an important and long-overdue change,” Becca Lewis, a research affiliate at the nonprofit organizati­on Data & Society, said about the new policy. “However, YouTube has often executed its community guidelines unevenly, so it remains to be seen how effective these updates will be.”

YouTube’s scale — more than 500 hours of new videos are uploaded every minute — has made it difficult for the company to track rule violations. And the company’s historical­ly lax approach to moderating extreme videos has led to a drumbeat of scandals, including accusation­s that the site has promoted disturbing videos to children and allowed extremist groups to organize on its platform. YouTube’s automated advertisin­g system has paired offensive videos with ads from major corporatio­ns, prompting several advertiser­s to abandon the site.

The kind of content that will be prohibited under YouTube’s new hate-speech policies includes videos that claim Jews secretly control the world, those that say women are intellectu­ally inferior to men and therefore should be denied certain rights, or that suggest that the white race is superior to another race, a YouTube spokesman said.

Channels that post some hateful content but that do not violate YouTube’s rules with the majority of their videos, might receive strikes under YouTube’s three-strike enforcemen­t system but would not be immediatel­y banned.

The company also said that channels that “repeatedly brush up against our hate speech policies,” but don’t violate them outright, would be removed from YouTube’s advertisin­g program, which allows channel owners to share in the advertisin­g revenue that their videos generate.

 ?? PATRICK SEMANSKY AP file, 2018 ?? YouTube’s new policy will ban ‘videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify discrimina­tion, segregatio­n or exclusion,’ the company said in a blog post. The prohibitio­n will also cover videos denying that violent incidents, like the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticu­t, took place.
PATRICK SEMANSKY AP file, 2018 YouTube’s new policy will ban ‘videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify discrimina­tion, segregatio­n or exclusion,’ the company said in a blog post. The prohibitio­n will also cover videos denying that violent incidents, like the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticu­t, took place.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States