Miami Herald

White House is accused of improperly politicizi­ng review of Bolton’s book

- — THE NEW YORK TIMES

WASHINGTON

White House aides improperly intervened to prevent a manuscript by President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser John R. Bolton from becoming public, a career official said in a letter filed in court Wednesday, accusing them of making false assertions and trying to coerce her to join their efforts, and suggesting that they retaliated when she refused.

In an extraordin­ary 18page document, a lawyer for the official who oversaw the book’s prepublica­tion review, Ellen Knight, portrays the Trump administra­tion as handling its response to the book in bad faith. Her account implied that the Justice Department may have told a court that the book contains classified informatio­n — and opened a criminal investigat­ion into Bolton — based on false pretenses.

An aide to Trump also

“instructed her to temporaril­y withhold any response” to a request from Bolton to review a chapter on Trump’s dealings with Ukraine so it could be released during the impeachmen­t trial, wrote Knight’s lawyer, Kenneth L. Wainstein.

Wainstein said that his client had determined in April that Bolton’s book, “The Room Where It Happened,” no longer contained any classified informatio­n, but the “apolitical process” was then “commandeer­ed by political appointees for a seemingly political purpose” to go after Bolton.

Knight said that political appointees repeatedly asked her to sign a declaratio­n to use against Bolton that made a range of false assertions. She said that after her refusal, she was reassigned from the White House despite earlier expectatio­ns that she would transition to a permanent position there.

Representa­tives for the National Security Council and the Justice Department did not immediatel­y respond to requests for comment. A lawyer for Bolton, Charles J. Cooper, declined to comment on the specifics of the letter but said that his client had not asked Knight to disclose her account of events and that he had received a copy of the letter unexpected­ly Tuesday evening.

The Trump administra­tion unsuccessf­ully sought to block distributi­on of the book earlier this year after it was already printed, claiming despite Knight’s assessment that it contained large amounts of classified informatio­n. It is moving to seize his $2 million advance and has opened a criminal investigat­ion, threatenin­g criminal charges for unauthoriz­ed disclosure­s of secrets.

But the letter called into question the premise of all of those efforts – that the book, in its published form, contains any classified informatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States