Miami Herald

Poor and held by ICE: ‘Low-hanging fruit of immigratio­n system’

While the wealthy stave off deportatio­n efforts from the comfort of their homes, roughly 50,000 others with little to no money remain in ICE detention.

- BY MONIQUE O. MADAN AND ROMINA RUIZ-GOIRIENA mmadan@miamiheral­d.com rruizgoiri­ena@elnuevoher­ald.com

Miryam López waited her turn in line.

The 55-year-old from Argentina came to the United States in 2002 on a tourist visa, fell in love, got married and in 2009 became a legal permanent resident. Except for a drug-related charge in 2012 that resulted in probation and a $763 fine, she lived a quiet life with her husband, Rudolph Marek, in Surfside — where Argentine empanadas are more plentiful than Cuban croquetas.

That peaceful life was disrupted in 2019 when she was picked up by immigratio­n authoritie­s, who came to her home and arrested López, shipping her to a detention center, where she has been fighting deportatio­n ever since.

Under the Trump administra­tion, the country has become increasing­ly

inhospitab­le for undocument­ed immigrants and those seeking asylum. But it has also recalibrat­ed the treatment of legal permanent residents — referred to as “green card” holders — and naturalize­d citizens, affording zero tolerance for transgress­ions that would have been of little interest under previous administra­tions.

“It’s the byproduct of a couple of things: zero tolerance policies, and I mean this in the lack of discretion, and wasting a lot of resources that could be much better spent,” said John Sandweg, former acting director of Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t (ICE) and former acting general counsel for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in an interview with the Miami Herald.

This picture stands in sharp contrast to the universe of ultrawealt­hy expats who have the money, the connection­s and the legal firepower to deflect prosecutio­n efforts in their home countries while remaining off the radar of immigratio­n officials in the United States. Many have made Miami their adoptive home.

Before the pandemic, roughly 50,000 foreign nationals were in ICE detention on any given day, often remaining for years, even as rich immigrants with serious legal issues were able to stave off incarcerat­ion and deportatio­n. That pre-COVID figure was an increase of about 15,000 from the tail end of the Obama administra­tion, when stays in detention averaged 27 days.

The number in detention has been decreasing since March as federal courts across the country ruled that ICE should release some detainees due to health concerns related to the coronaviru­s.

About 70% of the detainees during the Trump administra­tion have had no prior criminal conviction­s, according to figures disclosed by ICE.

“By wasting your time and money on that person, someone dangerous is walking free,” added Sandweg, who served during the Obama administra­tion.

UNEVEN PRIORITIES

In a memo to all ICE employees dated March 2, 2011, then-Director John Morton laid out what were and weren’t the agency’s priorities with regard to removals. The memo instructed agents to target immigrants “convicted of crimes, with a particular focus on violent criminals, felons, repeat offenders, members of gangs or individual­s subject to outstandin­g criminal warrants.”

That changed under the incoming Trump administra­tion, which came into office after a campaign built largely upon the bashing of asylum seekers and other immigrants and promises to build a “great, great wall” on the Mexican border.

Under Trump, DHS made everyone a priority, immigratio­n advocates say.

Heriberto Hernandez, an attorney based in Lake Worth, says he has dozens of clients currently in detention and in immigratio­n proceeding­s.

“Even if encountere­d by ICE, they would have been issued a notice to appear in court or simply released,” he said of the climate before January 2017. “They would likely not ever be detained nor transferre­d to an immigratio­n detention facility.”

Nate Snyder, a former senior counterint­elligence official at Homeland Security during the Obama administra­tion, agreed.

The mission of law enforcemen­t agencies has been “diluted,” Snyder told the Herald.

López’s story is chronicled in Miami federal court as part of an ongoing class-action lawsuit against ICE. The suit, filed in

April, seeks relief for thousands of immigrants detained — or once detained — in South Florida ICE facilities. The lawsuit cites the COVID-19 pandemic and the danger of the virus spreading when people are detained in close proximity to each other. Trial is scheduled for January 2021.

According to the documents, López was first flagged for “secondary inspection” by ICE at Miami Internatio­nal Airport in October 2016 after returning from her father’s funeral. Secondary inspection­s, basically an extra rigorous examinatio­n of documents primarily for foreign nationals, are a common practice by the Border Patrol when agents want to verify a passenger’s informatio­n.

López was told to return on

Jan. 11, 2017, at which time she was informed that she would be placed in removal proceeding­s, but she was not taken into custody because of her chronic obstructiv­e pulmonary disease (COPD), a serious breathing disorder.

That was just over a week before the change of administra­tions.

As it turned out, the notice to appear was never filed with the courts, according to a copy of her dossier, provided to her counsel in response to a Freedom of Informatio­n Act request for records.

López is detained at Broward Transition­al Center (BTC) in Pompano Beach, a facility privately run by GEO Group, a multi-billion-dollar company contracted by the federal government to run various detention centers and prisons across the country. BTC, one of three facilities at the center of the litigation, houses only low-level offenders and those with no criminal record.

ICE has maintained that the law has always allowed the removal of any legal permanent resident who committed a crime within five years of admission to the country or has two conviction­s regardless of the length of time in the United States. Neither is a category that López fits.

López’s attorney, Linda OsbergBrun, says her client’s breathing condition, known to ICE since 2017, should be factored into whether she is locked up during a pandemic.

“Detaining her now serves no useful government purpose and not only jeopardize­s her life but also, the government’s interests by creating a likely possibilit­y of another death while in its care,” she wrote in a letter to López’s deportatio­n officer, Eric Green.

As of Oct. 9, there have been at least 10 reported coronaviru­s deaths of detainees in ICE custody, with more than 6,700 people having contracted the virus behind bars, data shows.

TIPPING THE SCALES

Adrian Sosa-Fleites, a Cuban national at the Krome detention center in Miami-Dade, is another detainee who likely would not have been locked up under prior administra­tions. His attorney, Isadora Velázquez, says her 26year-old client has no criminal record and has been behind bars for the 20 months since he arrived. He entered the country in February 2019 through the U.S.Mexico border, long after President Barack Obama ended the protection­s of the policy known as “wet foot, dry foot,” which allowed Cubans to apply for green cards a year and a day after arrival provided they made it to the United States.

Velázquez’s multiple petitions to the U.S. government for SosaFleite­s’ release have continued to be ignored, she said. In her requests, she cites the ongoing classactio­n lawsuit in Miami federal court. The U.S. district judge overseeing the case, Marcia G. Cooke, has referred to ICE’s treatment of detainees at BTC, the Krome Processing Center in West MiamiDade and the Glades County detention center in Moore Haven, Florida, during the COVID-19 pandemic as “cruel and unusual.”

Velázquez believes the filing of the lawsuit actually prompted the government to begin hopscotchi­ng detainees from facility to facility — to complicate the lives of those seeking relief in immigratio­n court.

“That’s when it all became a hunting game,” Velázquez said.

Since his apprehensi­on in April 2019, Sosa-Fleites has been held at five different detention centers in multiple states, Velázquez said, noting that her boutique immigratio­n firm, like many others, has represente­d financiall­y burdened migrants like Sosa-Fleites without collecting a fee, while “having very little resources.”

A review of more than 1.2 million immigratio­n cases from 20072012 found that immigrants in detention who had a lawyer were four times more likely to be released from detention than the broader population of immigrant detainees.

“The immigratio­n system is so difficult to navigate even with great legal representa­tion, but money can even that out quite a bit,” Sandweg said.

Unlike the U.S. criminal justice system, where those jailed or imprisoned have the right to legal counsel, in the immigratio­n world that’s not the case, leaving thousands of immigrants without access to an attorney and more susceptibl­e to deportatio­n.

“You walk into immigratio­n detention and you notice that everyone is mainly low income,” Velázquez said. “The system targets poor immigrants. We are not deporting the dangerous people. We are deporting the poor because they can’t afford to fight.”

Johnny Sarmiento was a legal permanent resident for 24 years before being detained as he prepared to go to his vending operations job. Sarmiento, 41, was apprehende­d at his home in August because of a domestic violence charge that occurred 14 years earlier with a former partner.

Sarmiento, who has since been released on bond but remains in deportatio­n proceeding­s, said ICE “ambushed me at gunpoint when I was on my way to work.”

“I had walked out the door of my home and was in my car when three cars pulled up behind me,” Sarmiento said.

“At the end of it all, we had to make money we didn’t have, so that I could be released,” he added, noting that his wife reached out to gather about $7,000 in donations from family, friends and co-workers. “That’s money that takes more than half a year to make.”

In hopes of speeding up the deportatio­n of immigrants caught up in the ICE dragnet, the Trump administra­tion sought to hire new batches of immigratio­n judges.

The number of judges has nearly doubled. Those judges were then given quotas to clear 700 cases a year. That, combined with efforts to make it more difficult for detainees to communicat­e with lawyers and gather evidence to support their efforts to remain in the United States, has put immigrants in a bind, immigratio­n lawyers say.

Ashley Tabaddor, president of the National Associatio­n of Immigratio­n Judges — the union that represents the arbiters across the United States — agrees that the quotas give ICE an edge.

“It’s creating systemic bias against granting [requests for release] because the government is creating an incentive to finish cases through procedural mechanisms,” said Tabaddor, an adjunct professor at UCLA’s school of law.

BIG BUCKS

The system created under the Trump administra­tion has been a boon for one sector: the private prison industry.

Toward the end of the Obama administra­tion, the president instructed the Department of Justice to stop signing contracts with private prison companies.

The Geo Group and another contractor, Core Civic, both with huge footprints in Florida, suffered reductions in stock prices of roughly 35%, the Miami Herald reported at the time.

President Trump rescinded the order shortly after taking office, sending both companies’ stock prices soaring.

Juan Carlos Gomez, director of Florida Internatio­nal University’s immigratio­n law clinic, said “the system plays to the strengths of people with money. The pandemic just adds to the problem.”

“It’s simple: The poor are impacted disproport­ionately. And unfortunat­ely, many of the people in detention — who are people of color — barely had the means to put food on the table for their families when they were outside of detention,” he said.

Sandweg, the former ICE chief, called people like López, Sarmiento and Sosa-Fleites “the low-hanging fruit of the immigratio­n system.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States