‘Inhumane’: 100,000 Cubans in limbo as U.S. visa backlog grows
More than 78,000 Cubans wait for an immigration visa to come to the U.S. Another 22,000 remain in limbo after the suspension of a family reunification program. ‘What is happening is inhumane,’ one blogger comments.
When María Sulay López arrived in the United States in 2014, she assumed her son in Cuba would quickly get a visa to join her. But almost seven years later, the breast cancer patient still doesn’t know when they will be together.
As she gasped for breath from an oxygen tank, a result of a permanent tracheotomy, López said she can no longer work and just wants a solution.
“I’ve been waiting a long time,” she said on a recent afternoon. “And look at the condition I’m in.”
The case is among some 100,000 filed by Cubans and Cuban Americans in the U.S. hoping to reunite with family members on the island that are on hold as visa processing at the U.S. Em
bassy in Havana remains suspended. As the Biden administration reviews its Cuba policy, some in the exile community are clamoring for a quick resolution. The U.S. government withdrew most of its staff in 2017 after numerous diplomats fell ill from a mysterious ailment whose cause is still unknown but some suspect was an attack from a foreign adversary.
According to a U.S. State Department report, 78,228 family-based immigration claims are pending at the National Visa Center, which processes approved petitions, as of last November. Cuba is now among the 10 countries with the highest number of pending cases, according to the report.
That figure does not include those who are waiting for interviews at the embassy, a State Department official told the Miami Herald. Meanwhile, another 22,000 are on standby through the Cuban Family Reunification Parole Program, which provides a fast track for some petitioners with relatives in the U.S.
The enormous backlog has left thousands of Cuban families in limbo for more than four years. Ana Santiago, a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services spokeswoman, said the agency sent invitations to all eligible applicants to participate in the family reunification program in late 2016 and planned to do so again in 2017. But later that year, visa processing was halted. In 2018, the USCIS office in Havana was closed and refugee processing suspended. Combined with former President Donald Trump’s hard-line immigration policies and pandemic travel restrictions, many families have been left uncertain when they’ll be reunited.
A State Department official could not say when the embassy in Havana would resume visa services but said the U.S. remains committed to safe and legal migration.
Lourdes Hernández, who lives in Jacksonville, has been trying to bring her daughter, now 32, since 2014. Two years later, she received an invitation to participate in the reunification program. She sent in the paperwork and a $360 payment. Her daughter dropped out of college, thinking her departure was imminent, and put off other personal milestones, like getting married, that could delay or complicate her application.
But it would be years before she heard from the government again. Shortly before the pandemic, U.S. authorities informed her that an immigration visa was available, but then travel restrictions hit.
“This has affected our entire lives,” Hernández said between sobs. “My daughter has her uncles and grandmother in Cuba, but she doesn’t have me,
unfortunately.”
THE HAVANA EMBASSY
A broken immigration system for Cubans was, in part, the collateral damage of the mysterious incidents that affected the health of U.S. diplomats, their families, and CIA agents in the Cuban capital between the end of 2016 and May
2018. The cause of the so-called “Havana syndrome” is still being investigated by various federal agencies, including the CIA, and remains a key barrier in Cuba’s restoring ties with the U.S.
In September 2017, then-Secretary of State
Rex Tillerson ordered most embassy staff to evacuate and suspended visa processing. That meant Cubans have had to wait longer to get a response and travel out of the country, first to Colombia and currently Guyana, for visa interviews — a trip that is too expensive for most families to afford.
“It’s a huge expense to go to Guyana if you don’t have a relative who can help pay for the trip and hotel,” said Yaisel González, 33, the son of López, the cancer patient. “A ticket can cost $1,000.”
Those unwilling to wait embark on risky journeys through Central America to reach the Mexican border with the U.S. to seek asylum. But they, too, have run into restrictions. Under the Trump administration, thousands ended up in immigration detention centers where they spent several months fighting their asylum cases or were deported. Many others were returned to dangerous Mexican border cities to await the resolution of their asylum claims through the “Remain in Mexico” program, which was recently suspended by the Biden administration.
Immigration attorney Wilfredo Allen, who regularly represents Cuban clients, noted that citizens of other countries like Mexico usually have to wait much longer than Cubans — in some cases up to 20 years — to legally immigrate to the United States. But he believes that the resumption of the family reunification program for Cubans would prevent “desperate people risking their lives and embarking on the dangerous route through Mexico” to reach the border.
Cubans who come to the U.S. through this route can apply for permanent residence after one year and one day, thanks to the Cuban Adjustment Act, which is still in force.
Allen added that although the Cuban government was complying with immigration agreements and accepting deportees, the U.S. has not been granting the 20,000 visas promised to Cubans under the 1994 immigration accords with the island to avoid another rafter crisis.
The State Department did not respond to inquiries from the Herald asking if the U.S. had complied with the migration accords with Cuba since 2018. That year, the agency acknowledged that it would “face challenges” to reach the established quota.
The 22,000 applicants who applied through the family reunification program, which was established in 2007 to help meet the annual quota, have received no answer during this time. Their cases were never assigned to any embassy or consulate in third countries. Yet, regularly, the State Department has issued statements assuring that it was working to ensure the program’s continuing operation.
Jorge Duany, an immigration expert and director of the Cuban Research Institute at the Florida International University, says the Biden administration could weigh alternatives for these families and other Cubans trying to reach the U.S.
“Among other options, the U.S. consular personnel based in Havana could be expanded, taking the pertinent health precautions, so that Cubans could submit their visa applications on the island and would not have to travel to other countries to do so,” he said.
President Joe Biden could also grant parole to all Cuban asylum seekers detained in the United States and on the border with Mexico and reinstate a multiple entry visa program for Cubans to facilitate travel, he added.
SOCIAL MEDIA ACTIVISM
With Biden’s promises to reverse what he has characterized as “the failed Trump policies” that “inflicted harm on Cubans” and to build a “fair and humane” immigration system, many desperate families are hoping for a change.
During the Trump years, Facebook groups sprang up, helping organize those affected by the suspension of consular services in Havana. Some met with Miami congressional delegation members, such as Republican Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart, who wrote to the Trump administration requesting a solution, and former Democratic Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, who introduced a bill in November 2019 to resume the parole program for Cubans.
None of these efforts paid off. Now, Cubans and Cuban Americans are mobilizing again to get the new administration’s attention through Twitter and public demonstrations.
During the Trump administration, “it was challenging for them to be heard,” said Guennady Rodriguez, who is advocating for the families through his blog and podcast, “23 and Flagler.”
“Now there is another administration, and this is the moment to draw attention, especially since the Biden administration has already said that it was going to review the policy towards Cuba,” he said.
On his blog, Rodriguez posts messages and videos of Cubans explaining how the situation has affected their lives in an effort to draw sympathy from Cuban-American members of Congress and administration officials.
“Good afternoon, Congressmen Bob Menendez, Marco Rubio, and Mario Díaz-Balart,” begins one of these messages. “My name is Neudisleidis Rodríguez, and my family has been separated for nine years. My child was 2years-old at that time; today, he is 11-years-old and has lived far away from his father, as has my daughter, who is currently 14-years-old.
“I ask you to help us reopen the United States Embassy in Havana,” she wrote.
From Cuba, 28-year-old dentist José Carlos Rodríguez has been working with young computer scientists on the island to help nearly 700 people use Twitter to reach out to politicians and the media. It’s an ordeal he’s living himself: He has been waiting for a visa to join his wife in Broward County since 2018.
He created the account @CFRPtweet in January, and since then, he and others have flooded social media with personal messages and videos asking the Biden administration to “reopen” the embassy in Havana using the hashtags #FamiliesBelongTogether and #ReopenUSHavEmbassy.
“What we do is social media activism,” José Carlos Rodríguez said in a telephone interview from Havana. “And we promote any event related to the subject because the situation should be more known.”
Guennady Rodriguez, the blogger, helped organize a recent “prayer for the Cuban family” at the Ermita de la Caridad in Miami. A small gathering also took place in Little Havana at the end of January, organized by the Facebook group “Cubans for Family Reunification with the United States,” managed by Hernández.
“We are asking the administration to listen to us,” she said. “What is happening is inhumane.”
For González, 33, the wait has left him feeling powerless as his mother goes through grueling treatments while he is “on the other side, unable to do anything.”
The two stay in touch through phone and video calls, but he knows she needs more. He hasn’t seen her in three years.
“I would like to be there to help,” he said. “I am her only child.”
The bill also was altered to require the Board of Governors to develop an online dashboard featuring data on median salary, average student loan debt and debt-to-income ratio for different types of areas of study. Some speakers said the universities already provide this information.
Baxley downplayed that the measure is designed to save the state money, as the state faces budget constraints due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The bill analysis, however, says the impact on state funding starting on 2022-23 is expected to be an indeterminate “net positive to the state budget.”
“I don’t know that we will save a dime,” Baxley told senators on Tuesday. “We are not projecting how much more or how much less will be spent, we are redesigning the program to connect the world of work and the world of education.”
The program, which distributed $618 million in scholarships in the 201920 fiscal year, is funded by the Florida Lottery. The Legislature sold the lottery on the promise it would go to education, and Bright Futures was created to spend that money.
The Legislature has tinkered with Bright Futures many times before. Changes have been big and small, and stretch back decades — and some tweaks have been recycled over the years.
For instance, giving full Bright Futures scholarships only to students who get into professions in which there are shortages is not a new concept. Two decades ago, former Florida House Speaker Tom Feeney said it would be a good idea to do so to fill teaching and nursing jobs.
Baxley also is proposing language that, if approved, would no longer guarantee Bright Futures awards would cover 75% or 100% of students’ tuition and fees. Instead, the award amount would be set in the state budget.
The exact same language was approved by lawmakers in 2012, a few years after the Great Recession. Then, in 2018, the Legislature restored the top- and second-level awards to once again cover what is currently in state law.
The fate of the measure remains murky — and not just because of the backlash. The House has no companion bills, and education leaders in the chamber are not focused on the issue.
“I haven’t been working on anything related to Bright Futures,” House Education and Employment Committee Chairman Chris Latvala said in an interview. “It’s not anything I’m really focused on.”