A Bahamian-style inn might go up around a Black Miami pioneer’s home
West Coconut Grove’s restored E.W.F. Stirrup House could become the centerpiece of a Bahamian-style inn that was given initial approval by Miami commissioners.
The 1897 E.W.F. Stirrup House, one of Miami’s oldest standing homes and a onceendangered landmark in historically Black West Coconut Grove, is getting a new lease on life as part of a plan for a Bahamian-style inn that received an initial approval from Miami commissioners.
The two-story, wood-frame house, still owned by descendants of Bahamian-born pioneer settler Ebenezer Stirrup and recently painstakingly rebuilt, would be the historic centerpiece of what Stirrup-Simpson family members and their development partners are tentatively calling Grove Inn.
The plan has raised hope among longtime residents and activists — who are concerned by rampant gentrification, demolition and population loss in the West
Grove — that people in the historic community, which predates the incorporation of Miami, can participate meaningfully in its revitalization.
“It will be a very useful project in the development of the West Grove,” Dr. George
Simpson, the 96-year-old scion of the family, told Miami commissioners at a hearing Thursday. “There has
America won the future.’ ”
The administration’s promises are vast and may prove difficult to enact, even if the effort can get through Democrats’ extremely narrow majority in Congress. The immediate rejection of the plan by leading Republicans suggested that the path toward a bipartisan compromise on infrastructure would be very difficult to achieve, leaving the White House’s next move unclear.
The White House said the plan would enable drivers across the country to find electric charging stations for their vehicles on the road. Lead pipes throughout the country would be replaced. All Americans would have access to high-speed Internet connections by the end of the decade.
Biden released the spending plan with a slew of tax hikes on businesses, which could be the most contentious part of his proposal. The White House said the proposal would pay for itself over 15 years because many of the tax increases would remain even as the spending proposals only last for eight years. Biden said on Wednesday that the plan would reduce the federal debt “over the long haul.” Legislation in Washington is typically evaluated on a 10-year budget window, and it is unclear precisely what the plan would cost over a decade.
On the tax side, Biden’s plan includes raising the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%; increasing the global minimum tax paid from about 13% to 21%, ending federal tax breaks for fossil fuel companies, and increasing tax enforcement against corporations.
The White House is also proposing as much as
$400 billion in clean energy credits for firms, though the cost of the tax credit provisions is not detailed in what the administration has released.
The tax measures help Biden address concerns that his spending package would add to an already large federal deficit, but they provoked a torrent of opposition from GOP lawmakers and business groups. Congressional Republicans have also panned the tax increases as damaging to U.S. investment and competitiveness, and they have pledged to oppose them. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., denounced the measure. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., chair of the Senate Republican Conference, said it amounted to an “out-ofcontrol socialist spending spree” that reflected “the left’s radical agenda.”
“There is virtually no path to getting Republican votes. It’s too big, too expensive, and chock full of tax increases that are nonstarters among Republicans,” said Brian Riedl, a former aide to Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, who works at the Manhattan Institute, a libertarianleaning think tank.
Among Democrats, the plan has been met by objections from lawmakers in the Congressional Progressive Caucus, who say it is insufficient to meet the scale of the threat posed by climate change. Centrist Democrats are balking at another large spending package. Three House Democrats have vowed to oppose the package because it would not reverse a cap on state and local tax deductions from Trump’s tax law.
And a number of priorities critical to congressional Democrats, including an extension on the expanded child credit, a major expansion in health insurance coverage, subsidies for child care and free access to community colleges, are being left to a second White House package to be unveiled in coming weeks.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce criticized the proposed tax hikes in a statement on Wednesday, arguing that while infrastructure spending is necessary, “the users who benefit from the investment” should pay for it.
While opening the door for negotiations with Congress over the details, the White House is adamant about the need for a sweeping economic program that goes beyond immediate coronavirus relief. It cites the threat posed by climate change, the deterioration of the United States’ infrastructure and the long decline of U.S. manufacturing. But the White House may face a more difficult path for this package than the stimulus plan, which unified congressional Democrats with relatively little dissent.
Biden promised to
“bring Republicans into the Oval Office” to discuss the infrastructure measure and promised a “good faith negotiation.” But he said the plan had to be completed, suggesting that Democrats may be willing to try to pass it without Republican votes.
The president phoned Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on Tuesday to brief him on the details of the plan. McConnell, who mentioned the call during an event in Kentucky on Wednesday, signaled he’s still not a fan of the proposal.
“It’s like a Trojan horse,” McConnell told reporters, stressing that the Democrats’ new blueprint to upgrade roads, bridges, water ways and sewer systems relies on “more borrowing and massive tax increases on all the productive parts of our economy.”
Biden’s plan would devote more than $600 billion to rebuilding the United States’ infrastructure, such as its ports, railways, bridges and highways; about $300 billion to support domestic manufacturing; and more than $200 billion in housing infrastructure. Other major measures include at least $100 billion for a variety of priorities, including creating national broadband system, modernizing the electric power grid, upgrading school and educational facilities, investing in research and development projects, and ensuring America’s drinking water is safe.
Biden’s plan includes measures unrelated to either infrastructure or the climate, such as an approximately $400 billion investment in home-based care for the elderly and disabled that was a top demand of some union groups. Additionally, the plan calls for passage of the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, or PRO Act, a bill aimed at significantly strengthening workers’ rights to organize.
Biden’s plan lays out a large investment in cleanenergy and environmental priorities. The programs include $100 billion to bolster the country’s electricity grid and phase out fossil fuels, in part by extending a production tax credit for 10 years that supports renewable energy.
Biden, who has pledged to make the power sector carbon-free by 2035, will also ask Congress to adopt an “Energy Efficiency and Clean Electricity Standard” that would set targets to cut how much coal- and gas-fired electricity power companies use.
Investing in electric vehicles ranks among Biden’s top climate-spending priorities, with $174 billion designated for that market alone. White House officials predicted that the federal incentives, paired with spending by state and local governments and private companies, would establish a national network of 500,000 charging stations by 2030, while spurring a domestic supply chain that will support union jobs and Americanbuilt cars and trucks.
The plan will also replace 50,000 diesel transit vehicles while switching about 20% of school buses to electric engines.
Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich., who has been working on compromise legislation to cut carbon emissions from cars and trucks, said this week that funding charging stations and better transmission lines will be key. “People aren’t going to buy electric vehicles until we have the charging infrastructure and the electricity grid to support it,” she said.