Miami Herald

Biden appears ready to extend U.S. troop presence in Afghanista­n

- BY ROBERT BURNS

Without coming right out and saying it, President Joe Biden seems ready to let lapse a May 1 deadline for completing a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanista­n. Orderly withdrawal­s take time, and Biden is running out of it.

Biden has inched so close to the deadline that his indecision amounts almost to a decision to put off, at least for a number of months, a pullout of the remaining 2,500 troops and continue supporting the Afghan military at the risk of a Taliban backlash. Removing all of the troops and their equipment in the next three weeks — along with coalition partners that cannot get out on their own — would be difficult logistical­ly, as Biden himself suggested in late March.

“It’s going to be hard to meet the May 1 deadline,” he said. “Just in terms of tactical reasons, it’s hard to get those troops out.” Tellingly, he added, “And if we leave, we’re going to do so in a safe and orderly way.”

James Stavridis, a retired Navy admiral who served as NATO’s top commander from 2009 to 2013, says it would be unwise at this point to get out quickly.

“Sometimes not making a decision becomes a decision, which seems the case with the May 1 deadline,”

Stavridis said in an email exchange Wednesday. “The most prudent course of action feels like a sixmonth extension and an attempt to get the Taliban truly meeting their promises — essentiall­y permitting a legitimate ‘conditions based’ withdrawal in the fall.”

There are crosscurre­nts of pressure on Biden. On the one hand, he has argued for years, including during his time as vice president, when President Barack Obama ordered a huge buildup of U.S. forces, that Afghanista­n is better handled as a smaller-scale counterter­rorism mission. Countering Russia and China has since emerged as a higher priority.

On the other hand, current and former military officers have argued that leaving now, with the Taliban in a position of relative strength and the Afghan government in a fragile state, would risk losing what has been gained in 20 years of fighting.

“A withdrawal would not only leave America more vulnerable to terrorist threats; it would also have catastroph­ic effects in Afghanista­n and the region that would not be in the interest of any of the key actors, including the Taliban,” a bipartisan experts group known as the Afghan Study Group concluded in a February report. The group, whose cochairman, retired Gen. Joseph Dunford, is a former commander of U.S. forces in Afghanista­n and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs, recommende­d Biden extend the deadline beyond May, preferably with some sort of agreement by the Taliban.

If the troops stay, Afghanista­n will become Biden’s war. His decisions, now and in coming months, could determine the legacy of a 2001 U.S. invasion that was designed as a response to al-Qaida’s Sept. 11 attacks, for which the extremist group led by Osama bin Laden used Afghanista­n as a haven.

Biden said during the 2020 campaign that if elected he might keep a counterter­rorism force in Afghanista­n but also would “end the war responsibl­y” to ensure U.S. forces never have to return. The peace talks that began last fall between the Taliban and the Afghan government are seen as the best hope, but they have produced little so far.

Postponing the U.S. withdrawal carries the risk of the Taliban resuming attacks on U.S. and coalition forces, possibly escalating the war.

Congress has been cautious about reducing the U.S. military presence in Afghanista­n. Last year it expressly forbade the Pentagon from using funds to reduce below 4,000 troops, but the Pentagon went ahead anyway after President Donald Trump ordered a reduction to 2,500 after he lost the election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States