Miami Herald

Toxic chemicals in Puerto Rican tap water linked to coal ash from energy firm, study says

- BY SYRA ORTIZ-BLANES sortizblan­es@elnuevoher­ald.com Syra Ortiz-Blanes: @syraortizb

Toxic chemicals and heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium, lead and uranium have been found in the drinking water of the Puerto Rican towns of Guayama and Salinas, according to a recent analysis from the Puerto Rico Chemists Associatio­n, which the group says come from coal ash produced by an energy company on the south side of the island.

“The people have a right to know what they are drinking,” said Dr. Osvaldo Rosario, a former professor of environmen­tal chemistry for 38 years at the University of Puerto Rico and an advisor to a Chemists Associatio­n special committee studying the impact of the coal ash.

Researcher­s took tap water samples in March and August from five homes in different neighborho­ods and one government water well. They also detected manganese, cobalt, chrome, molybdenum, nickel, strontium and vanadium — all minerals found in the coal ash of Applied Energy Systems, a company that burns coal to generate electricit­y in Guayama.

“Those compounds are exactly the compounds that appear in coal ash. That is the fingerprin­t of the coal ash,” said Luis Cordero, former president of the Puerto Rico Chemists Associatio­n who also belongs to the special committee.

Rosario added that there could be “bio-accumulati­on” — where contaminan­ts accumulate in the body over time — as well as certain population­s, such as children and sick or immunocomp­romised people, that could be particular­ly vulnerable. And the chemicals in combinatio­n can also aggravate each other’s harmful effects, the scientist said.

“The ash that remains at the bottom of the burning has a whole series of compounds that are toxic and carcinogen­ic,” said Rosario.

While the two men emphasized that the levels of individual chemicals found in the tap water supply don’t exceed national safety limits, they pointed to studies that show that the combinatio­n of chemicals, even in low quantities, can harm human health.

“The regulation­s are not written for mixtures of compounds,” Rosario said. “It has been difficult for agencies to establish safe levels for mixtures of compounds.”

The findings were revealed at a press conference on Sept. 29 at the headquarte­rs of the chemists’ associatio­n. The research joins a growing body of studies and investigat­ions that examine the potential impact of the coal ash produced by AES in Puerto Rico, including an analysis requested by the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency.

Two nearby communitie­s have a higher prevalence of respirator­y and skin illnesses compared to two communitie­s in the town of Fajardo, far away from the AES plant, according to a 2016 study conducted by the University of Puerto Rico’s Graduate School of Public Health. The prevalence of having chronic bronchitis in Guayama was five times higher and seven times higher for skin hives, the researcher­s found.

In response to the Puerto Rico Chemists Associatio­n study, AES said it followed

all legal regulation­s and industry standards, and that its priority was worker and community safety.

“Our operations are highly regulated and continuous­ly audited by numerous local and federal agencies, making us a model in safe and reliable power generation,” said Samuel Arroyo-Arzuaga, spokespers­on for AES Puerto Rico, referring questions to published company reports.

He also emphasized that the company is committed to transition­ing toward renewable and clean energy sources as quickly as possible.

COMMUNITY RESISTS AES

AES’ coal-fired power plant in Guayama began operations in 2002, generating electricit­y for the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority. Over the past two decades, AES has deposited coal ash byproducts in the Dominican Republic

and Puerto Rico, as well as the continenta­l U.S.

The company also stockpiles a mountain of a byproduct made of water and ash near the facility that was about 49 feet tall and weighed about 118,000 tons in 2020, according to AES reports.

When rain falls over the ashes, the substance dissolves, the precipitat­ion seeps through the terrain, reaching the aquifer, Rosario explained.

The depositing of ashes in Puerto Rico has provoked a fierce backlash from local communitie­s, environmen­tal activists and experts. Protests have erupted on the island in recent years, including in the southweste­rn town of Peñuelas, where AES has deposited ash in landfills, as well as at the Governor’s Mansion in San Juan.

“AES has never assumed its responsibi­lity for the pollution and the health of the people who live near the plant, who are very

sick. People are dying next to AES and here the government looks the other way,” said Victor Alvarado Guzmán, a founding member of the Comité Dialogo Ambiental de Salinas, an environmen­tal organizati­on based in Salinas that has been actively involved in the grassroots battle against AES.

DEMANDS FOR GOVERNMENT ACTION

The Chemists Associatio­n of Puerto Rico has held two symposiums on the coal ash produced by AES in Puerto Rico. And now, the scientists aim to study the effects of another kind of contaminat­ion the plant produces: fine dust and gases. They also hope to expand studies of the impact of the ashes in other regions of Puerto Rico, including Peñuelas.

“As long as those ashes are there, the threat will continue, it will continue to contaminat­e more and more of this water ... out of sheer greed, for not properly disposing of the ashes,” said Rosario.

The Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority never gave access to the chemists’ group to wells, Cordero said. They never received a response to their letters asking for access, while the government’s Environmen­tal Quality Board referred them back to the water authority, Cordero said. He added that the executive director of the water authority told him the letters had not reached her office. The scientists consider the study “explorator­y” and sent the results to the government so they can build on their work.

“We are giving them the data so that they can move to do it. Now they have a reason to do it. They can no longer be ignorant and not do the work. They have to do it,” Rosario said.

In January 2020, then Gov. Wanda Vázquez signed a law that prohibited the dumping of coal ash on all roads, terrains, landfills, and water systems on the island. However, ash deposits remain in Puerto Rico.

Community leaders like Alberto Colón, who lives only a mile from the AES plant, want the coal-burning power generator closed and the ashes cleaned up in his community. He told the Miami Herald that he suffers from sinusitis, and has witnessed how his community has gotten sicker and sicker throughout the years.

“We are heading towards the fact that the aquifer is going to be contaminat­ed in its entirety and harm everyone’s health,” Colón said.

 ?? José A. Menendez ?? The AES coal-fired power plant in Guayama, Puerto Rico, produces 300,000 tons of toxic ash annually.
José A. Menendez The AES coal-fired power plant in Guayama, Puerto Rico, produces 300,000 tons of toxic ash annually.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States