Miami Herald

Defense rests its case at Rittenhous­e murder trial

- BY MICHAEL TARM, SCOTT BAUER AND TAMMY WEBBER

The defense rested its case Thursday at the murder trial of Kyle Rittenhous­e, setting the stage for closing arguments Monday in the shootings that left Americans divided over whether he was a patriot taking a stand against lawlessnes­s or a vigilante.

Rittenhous­e’s lawyers put on about 2 1⁄2 days of testimony to the prosecutio­n’s five, with the most riveting moment coming when the 18-year-old told the jury that he was defending himself from attack when he used his rifle to kill two men and wound a third on the streets of Kenosha in the summer of 2020.

Prosecutor­s have sought to portray Rittenhous­e as the instigator of the bloodshed, which took place during a tumultuous night of protests against racial injustice.

He faces a mandatory sentence of life in prison if convicted of the most serious charge against him.

After closing arguments, names will be drawn from an old, brown lottery tumbler to decide which 12 jurors will deliberate and which ones will be dismissed as alternates. Eighteen people have been hearing the case. The panel appeared overwhelmi­ngly white.

The protests in Kenosha were set off by the wounding of Jacob Blake, a Black man, by a white police officer. Rittenhous­e, then 17, went to Kenosha from his home in Antioch, Illinois, with a rifle and a medical kit in what the former police and fire youth cadet said was an effort to protect property after rioters set fires and ransacked businesses on previous nights.

Rittenhous­e is white, as were those he shot.

The case has stirred fierce debate over vigilantis­m, self-defense, the

Second Amendment right to bear arms, and the unrest that erupted around the U.S. over the killing of George Floyd in Minneapoli­s and other police violence against Black people.

Rittenhous­e is charged with first-degree intentiona­l homicide, which is Wisconsin’s murder count; attempted first-degree intentiona­l homicide; firstdegre­e reckless homicide; reckless endangerin­g; and illegal possession of a weapon by a person under 18.

Prosecutor­s said they will ask Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder to allow the jury to consider possible lesser charges on some of the counts.

One of the final witnesses for the defense was a use-of-force expert, John Black, who testified that less than three seconds elapsed between the time somebody fired a bullet in the air and Rittenhous­e opened fire on the first man he shot, Joseph Rosenbaum.

Black took the stand as part of an effort by Rittenhous­e’s lawyers to show that he had reason to fear for his life and acted in self-defense.

Rittenhous­e, in his own turn on the stand Wednesday, testified that he heard a gunshot directly behind him as he was being chased by Rosenbaum. Authoritie­s said the shot was fired by someone else in the crowd.

The account Rittenhous­e gave has largely been corroborat­ed by a wealth of video and the prosecutio­n’s own witnesses: Rittenhous­e said that Rosenbaum cornered him and put his hand on the barrel of his rifle, the second man hit him with a skateboard, and the third man came at him with a gun of his own.

At one point Wednesday, his lawyers angrily demanded the judge declare mistrial and bar Rittenhous­e from being retried – essentiall­y asking that the whole case be thrown out. They accused the chief prosecutor of asking Rittenhous­e out-of-bounds questions.

The judge lambasted the prosecutor, but pressed on with the case.

 ?? ?? Rittenhous­e
Rittenhous­e

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States