Miami Herald

Nicaragua is sliding toward dictatorsh­ip under Ortega

- BY SHELLEY A. MCCONNELL smcconnell@stlawu.edu

When diplomats sit down this week for the 51st General Assembly of the Organizati­on of American States (OAS), they will be miles apart both literally and politicall­y.

Among other topics, they must address the divisive subject of last Sunday’s elections in Nicaragua, which came nowhere near meeting internatio­nal standards.

The OAS has been ineffectiv­e in halting Nicaragua’s slide into dictatorsh­ip. In 2018, Nicaragua expelled human rights investigat­ors, then rejected OAS recommenda­tions for restoring democracy. Last May, Nicaragua ignored an OAS deadline for electoral reforms. Last month, members formally expressed alarm over Nicaragua’s electoral process, but seven countries abstained, reflecting disagreeme­nt over whether the OAS should concern itself with democratic erosion that falls short of a military coup d’etat.

THE CONTRAS

Daniel Ortega was first elected in 1984 after toppling the Somoza dictatorsh­ip. The Reagan administra­tion implemente­d a trade and financial embargo to destabiliz­e what it saw as an emerging communist regime, and funded counterrev­olutionary forces known as the Contras to attempt to force Ortega out.

In 1990, Ortega left office peaceably after losing an election scrutinize­d by internatio­nal observers. However, when he was re-elected in 2006, he proceeded to systematic­ally dismantle Nicaragua’s democratic government.

With his party controllin­g election authoritie­s, Ortega strong-armed the courts into abolishing the two-term limit on the presidency in 2009. He claimed victory in shoddy elections in 2011 and 2016 that lacked transparen­cy.

His Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) manufactur­ed a supermajor­ity in the legislatur­e that reformed the constituti­on to give presidenti­al decrees the force of law, put the president in charge of taxation and permit active-duty military and police officers to hold political office.

Ortega purportedl­y won 75% of last Sunday’s vote, largely by jailing seven opposition leaders, including the serious presidenti­al contenders, and banning three opposition parties from participat­ing. Government employees reported being coerced into voting lest they lose their jobs.

Such fears are not farfetched. In 2018, Nicaraguan police and FSLNaffili­ated youth mobs crushed protests over pension cuts. Responding to calls for Ortega’s resignatio­n, the regime killed at least 320 people and jailed many more, allegedly torturing some.

NO LONGER SAFE

Most of those imprisoned, killed or injured were students, urban workers and peasants, but even business leaders who had previously aligned themselves with Ortega’s crony capitalist regime were no longer safe. Some Catholic clergy became targets for regime harassment.

Nicaragua continues to hold at least 130 political prisoners, and more than 100,000 Nicaraguan­s have been driven into exile and thus could not cast a ballot.

For now, U.S. military interventi­on is off the table. Instead, the Treasury has sanctioned Ortega supporters, and the State Department has denied some government figures and their family members visas.

President Trump signed a bill curtailing loans to Nicaragua and the Biden administra­tion has signed a law calling for review of Nicaragua’s participat­ion in the Central American Free Trade Agreement.

In 2001, OAS members made democratic governance a right and identified conditions under which the organizati­on can expel an undemocrat­ic member. But that is unlikely to happen at this week’s meeting. In any case, it would just cut off a channel for multilater­al communicat­ion.

UNDEMOCRAT­IC?

On the other hand, if the foreign ministers do nothing more than exhort Nicaragua to return to a democratic path, they risk rendering the OAS irrelevant and tempting the U.S. to resume a unilateral role in policing politics in the region.

The foreign ministers should begin by calling Nicaragua’s election what it was, an undemocrat­ic process, and listing the Ortega regime as a de facto government, not a legitimate­ly elected one. They should establish a timetable for implementi­ng measures that would curtail Nicaragua’s participat­ion in certain OAS activities. Nicaragua should have no voice on human rights until its political prisoners are freed.

Shelley A. McConnell, associate professor of government at St. Lawrence University, served as senior associate director of the Americas Program at The Carter Center. She observed Nicaraguan elections in 1990, 1996, 2001 and 2006 with the UN and The Carter Center.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States