Why Californians are fleeing this once-Golden State

LOS ANGELES

It seems only yesterday that California’s population was nearly 40 million. Then more people left the state. Now the population is not even at 39 million.

The U.S. Census Bureau reported in March that California’s population as of July had dropped to an estimated 38,965,000. That’s down by 75,400 in a year — and 573,000 below the peak of 39.5 million in 2020.

Entering this century, when California’s stillgrowing population was 34 million, the state was predicted to reach 45 million by 2020 and almost 60 million by 2040. So much for that.

People have been fleeing this once-Golden State. And the exodus accelerat— ed on Gov. Gavin Newsom’s watch.

That probably won’t be accentuated in Newsom’s State of the State speech — if he ever gives one this year. It’s already three months past the time governors traditionally have delivered their muchanticipated annual address.

Newsom hates giving prepared speeches. But he loves pitching California. And a bolting citizenry doesn’t fit his usual narrative that all is terrific.

Anyway, the fact that Newsom has been governor while constituents flee the state is mostly coincidental. Sure, state public policy decisions have helped motivate some people to leave. But they probably would have departed no matter who was the governor.

California just got too big for its carrying capacity at least in the sprawling, ranch-house lifestyle that so many people covet and which symbolizes the state’s easy-living persona.

“Grow and grow and grow and eventually there’s not enough room,” says Hans Johnson, a demographer at the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California.

“The easy places for growth have been used up. Growth today means infill development [in cities]. That’s expensive and controversial. Or you live further away from your job.”

Or leave the state and find cheaper housing almost anywhere.

Out-of-state migration is the main cause of California’s continuing population loss. But there are additional reasons.

Post-World War II baby boomers — those born between 1946 and 1964 — are starting to die. And their children and grandchildren haven’t been producing enough babies to replace them.

“California’s fertility rate has fallen faster than most [states’],” the public policy institute reported in October. “In 2008 its rate was above the national average (2.15). By 2020, it fell to the seventh lowest (1.52).”

The COVID-19 pandemic exacted a death toll, particularly on older people. Overall, deaths in California increased by 19% in 2020 over the previous year, the institute reported.

The pandemic also virtually shut down foreign migration into California. It had been the main driver of population growth for several years. When COVID struck, visa restrictions were invoked to reduce the virus’ spread.

Legal and undocumented immigration have increased since the pandemic, “but not to prior levels — nowhere near,” Johnson says.

“California is no longer the preferred destination it used to be.”

For one thing, Johnson says, Mexico’s birth rate has significantly declined, and its labor market is less competitive. Fewer Mexicans are heading north searching for work, although many Central Americans are seeking asylum, mostly in other states.

And another thing — something into which demographers usually don’t delve: Trump administration policies clamped down especially on illegal immigration. The Biden administration eased up.

But “the biggest reason we’re losing population is that people are moving out,” Johnson says. “That has slowed, but we’re still losing hundreds of thousands to other states.” That’s a net loss after factoring in people moving to California.

And why are they leaving? Mainly because of California’s high cost of living, particularly housing. That’s the biggest reason movers cite.

The median cost of a California house was nearly $800,000 in November, more than double the $336,000 you’d pay in Texas, according to Redfin housing market data. In neighboring Arizona and Nevada, it was $435,000 and $479,000, respectively. These are destination states for departing Californians.

Blame California’s high costs of land and labor plus regulatory quagmires and neighborhood resistance to growth. Newsom and legislators have been wrestling with these issues for years and enacted new laws, but they haven’t generated much progress in making home buying more affordable.

During the pandemic, Johnson says, highly educated people with the opportunity to work remotely began leaving California because they could find affordable housing and do their jobs at home rather than commute long distances.

Also, higher-income people began leaving for states such as Texas and Nevada that do not have income taxes. California has the nation’s highest state income tax rate, 13.3%. The state also has high sales and gas taxes. We’re a high-tax state, a fact Newsom pooh-poohs.

There’s evidence that some conservatives are leaving California because they can’t tolerate our liberal politics.

Many probably didn’t like Newsom’s closing of shops and schools during the pandemic. Other states were less restrictive.

The Idaho secretary of state reported in November that of nearly 30,000 ex-Californians who had moved to the Gem State, 75% registered to vote as Republicans. Only 10% signed up as Democrats.

That’s bad news for the declining California GOP.

What else does California’s continued population loss mean?

More room on the freeways and less congestion generally.

Less stress on our unstable water supply.

But also less tax revenue. With the top 20% of earners — those families making at least $120,000 a year — supplying 91% of the state income tax, a continued exodus is sure to lighten the Sacramento pocketbook. The state is facing a budget deficit of tens of billions of dollars. There’s an argument over the exact amount.

California loses national political clout as people leave. We’ll probably surrender two more U.S. House seats after the 2030 Census. We lost one in 2020 while still growing.

One way to make California more enticing would be to offer a benefit that worked well for generations until the state got greedy in the 1970s: Free tuition at public universities for California residents. That would at least help prevent a brain drain.