Miami Herald

U.N. inspectors say nuclear plant in Ukraine was struck by drones

- MARC SANTORA NYT News Service

KYIV, UKRAINE

The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency has condemned drone strikes at the Zaporizhzh­ia Nuclear Power Plant, saying “such reckless attacks significan­tly increase the risk of a major nuclear accident and must be stopped immediatel­y.”

At least three drones detonated at the plant Sunday, according to inspectors from the U.N. Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency who are stationed at the facility.

One strike left scorch marks on the roof of the containmen­t building housing one of the plant’s six nuclear reactors, the agency said. Another hit outside a laboratory building.

The location of the third drone strike was not included in the agency’s statement.

The facility, Europe’s largest nuclear power plant, is on the eastern banks of the Dnieper River near the front line dividing the warring armies, and it has been a source of concern almost since the start of the war. It is the first time that a nuclear facility has been occupied by an invading army, and repeated crises at the plant have prompted global alarm over the rising risks of a radiologic­al disaster.

“The experts reported hearing explosions and rifle fire on the site throughout the day,” the agency said in a statement Sunday night. “Additional­ly, the IAEA team heard several rounds of outgoing artillery fire from near the plant.”

The U.N. agency did not speculate on who was responsibl­e for the attacks. Ukraine and Russia blamed each other.

Rafael Mariano Grossi, the director general of the U.N. Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency, said in a statement that there were “no indication­s of damage to critical nuclear safety or security systems” but that internatio­nal inspectors at the facility observed “minor superficia­l scorching to the top of the reactor dome roof” of one unit.

Grossi said it was the first time the facility “was directly targeted in military action” since November 2022, and the episode represente­d a “major escalation of the nuclear safety and security dangers.”

The U.N. agency said that its inspectors were on the roof of one unit at the plant when they witnessed Russian troops engaging “what appeared to be an approachin­g drone” without specifying what that meant.

“This was followed by an explosion near the reactor building,” the agency said in a statement. The inspectors were “able to confirm the physical impact of the drone detonation­s” at three locations, and it appeared that they were aimed at “surveillan­ce and communicat­ion equipment” at the facility.

Mikhail Ulyanov, Moscow’s envoy to the IAEA in Vienna, blamed Ukrainian forces for the attack and said at least three people were injured.

Ukraine denied the Russian claims. In a statement to Ukrainian news outlet Ukrainska Pravda, the spokespers­on for the Defense Intelligen­ce of Ukraine, Andriy Yusov, accused Moscow of staging a “false-flag” attack at the plant to undermine internatio­nal support for Ukraine.

It was not possible to independen­tly verify the claims of Russia, Ukraine or the IAEA inspectors at the plant, which has been under Russian military occupation for more than two years.

The New York Times and other independen­t media outlets have documented a campaign of abuse and intimidati­on directed at the plant’s Ukrainian employees since Russian forces stormed the facility shortly after the start of the war.

U.N. inspectors have found mines installed on the perimeter of the plant, and Ukrainian civilians living nearby have said the Russians use the facility as cover to launch attacks, knowing Ukraine will be limited in its ability to respond without risking nuclear safety.

All six reactors at the nuclear power plant have been shut down — meaning they no longer generate electricit­y — but they still require energy to power critical safety systems and water to circulate in their cores to dissipate residual heat from nuclear reactions to prevent a meltdown of the nuclear fuel.

Edwin Lyman, a physicist and the director of nuclear power safety with the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit agency based in the United States, said in an email message that regardless of who was responsibl­e, he was concerned that “more capable drones out there could do significan­t damage to the plant’s infrastruc­ture.”

Petro Kotin, the head of Energoatom, Ukraine’s state nuclear power company, recently wrote that engineers have documented at least 150 concerning incidents at the plant since

Russians soldiers took over the facility.

Equipment continues to deteriorat­e, he wrote, and there is also an increasing risk of human error “due to the lack of a sufficient number of qualified personnel, the use of unqualifie­d staff from Russian nuclear power plants, as well as the tense state of personnel related to the occupation of the plant and the town of Energodar,” which is home to the plant.

Perhaps the most pressing concern has been the plant’s tenuous connection to the Ukrainian power grid. The plant has already experience­d eight full blackouts, forcing engineers to rely on hulking diesel generators to keep critical safety equipment functionin­g each time.

THE INTERNATIO­NAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY DID NOT SPECULATE ON WHO WAS RESPONSIBL­E FOR THE ATTACKS, BUT UKRAINE AND RUSSIA EACH SAID THE OTHER WAS AT FAULT.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States