Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Jury still out on Walker’s tax-cut vow

- TOM KERTSCHER MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL

Announcing his run for the 2016 Republican presidenti­al nomination, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker pledged to lower the tax burden for Americans if he was elected.

That run didn’t last long. But the promise echoed one Walker made in 2014 during his re-election campaign.

That pledge was: “Continue to reduce the tax burden on working families” and senior citizens in Wisconsin for each year he was in office.

Next to his dramatic takedown of public employee unions in 2011, tax cuts are arguably the most-lasting impact of Walker’s six-year tenure as governor and a key reason he emerged as a potential presidenti­al contender. And those reductions are likely to be highlighte­d on Tuesday, when the governor gives his annual “state of the state” speech.

So, turning to the Walk-O-Meter, which

tracks Walker’s campaign promises, has the governor continued to reduce the tax burden on working families, a term that suggests people of modest or lesser means, and senior citizens?

“The answer probably depends on how you interpret the question,” said Dale Knapp, research director of the nonprofit Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance.

For one thing, “working families” is not a precise term. And the alliance, the nonprofit Wisconsin Budget Project and the nonpartisa­n state Legislativ­e Fiscal Bureau all told us they had not done tallies on working families or senior citizens.

But there’s no question there have been a series of tax cuts under Walker — albeit not as much in the years since he made the promise as in his first term.

Tallying tax cuts

While campaignin­g for president in August 2015, Walker said he had cut taxes by $4.7 billion since becoming governor in 2011, and we rated his claim True. The amount included billions from a manufactur­ing and industry tax cut in 2011, and income and property tax cuts in 2013.

We rated Mostly True his presidenti­al campaign claim in July 2015 that because of his actions, Wisconsin “property taxes today are lower than they were four years ago.” The lower taxes were due in part to declines in housing values that had only partially recovered.

But Walker’s promise was made in 2014. So, what’s happened since then?

More tax cuts, though not as extensive as earlier in his tenure.

Here are two made in 2015, according to an August memo from the fiscal bureau:

Income tax deduction: $20.9 million in savings, starting in the 2016-’17 budget year, from an increase in the standard deduction for married filers that was approved in 2015.

Property tax relief: $213 million, starting in the 2016-’17 budget year, through a reduction in property taxes as a result of increases in school aids and school levy tax credits made in 2015.

Property taxes are particular­ly important to senior citizens on fixed incomes and they clearly are a big bite for working families, including renters who arguably pay them indirectly. The property tax bill has trended downward for a typical home and is lower than when Walker took office, the fiscal bureau told us.

The tax on a medianvalu­e home (roughly $153,000) for property taxes in 2015 and payable in 2016 was $2,849, according to the fiscal bureau. That’s up from $2,831 from the previous year.

But before that, the median tax had dropped each year from $2,963, the year before Walker took office.

It’s worth noting that Walker’s first budget, for 2011-’13, contained what the fiscal bureau classified as $49 million in tax increases.

The largest change was a reduction in the state Earned Income Tax Credit, which reduces the amount of income taxes a person owes, or enables the person to get a tax refund. Walker disputed the characteri­zation of the credit change as a tax increase, saying that decreasing a tax credit is reducing spending, not increasing taxes.

Our rating

Walker promised while running for reelection to continue to reduce the tax burden on working families and seniors every year he is in office. Halfway into his second term, he has continued to cut taxes. We rate this promise In the Works.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States