Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Intelligen­ce feud Trump’s own

- JON GREENBERG Jon Greenberg is a reporter for PolitiFact.com. The Journal Sentinel’s PolitiFact Wisconsin is part of the PolitiFact network.

The first agency Donald Trump visited as president was the Central Intelligen­ce Agency, and he had nothing but praise for the people who work there.

“Very, very few people could do the job you people do,” Trump said.

He vowed to give the CIA all the support it might ever need and dismissed any talk that it didn’t enjoy his respect.

“I have a running war with the media,” he said. “They are among the most dishonest human beings on earth. And they sort of made it sound like I had a feud with the intelligen­ce community. And I just want to let you know, the reason you’re the No. 1 stop is exactly the opposite.”

In this fact-check, we examine whether the press created the storyline that there was friction between Trump and the intelligen­ce community.

A look at Trump’s own words reveal his readiness to deploy some harsh language. We count several specific instances when he publicly disparaged the intelligen­ce community.

On Dec. 9, the Washington Post reported that intelligen­ce officials had concluded that Russia had interfered with the presidenti­al election to undermine Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

Citing an unnamed official, the article said, “It is the assessment of the intelligen­ce community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected.”

The Trump transition team responded with a statement that discredite­d the intelligen­ce agencies.

“These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destructio­n,” the statement said.

On Jan. 5, Trump had kinder words.

“The media lies to make it look like I am against ‘Intelligen­ce’ when in fact I am a big fan!,” he tweeted. Trump’s counselor, Kellyanne Conway, emphasized that point in a Jan. 22, interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” She noted a Jan. 6 statement from Trump in which he said, “I respect the service of our great men and women in the intelligen­ce community.”

But Trump’s language took a sharper tone when CNN reported on Jan. 10, about a file claiming that the Russians had embarrassi­ng personal and financial informatio­n on Trump. According to reports, the file had been compiled by people working for Trump’s American political opponents and leaked to the press. CNN reported that intelligen­ce officials also received the file and had briefed both Trump and President Barack Obama about its existence.

On Jan. 11, Trump tweeted “Intelligen­ce agencies should never have allowed this fake news to ‘leak’ into the public. One last shot at me. Are we living in Nazi Germany?”

Trump didn’t back down when he was asked about the Nazi comparison at a news conference later that day.

“I think it was disgracefu­l — disgracefu­l that the intelligen­ce agencies allowed any informatio­n that turned out to be so false and fake out,” he said. “I think it’s a disgrace, and I say that — and I say that, and that’s something that Nazi Germany would have done and did do.”

Trump also tweeted his suspicions that intelligen­ce officials were behind the leaked file.

“Totally made up facts by sleazebag political operatives, both Democrats and Republican­s — FAKE NEWS! Russia says nothing exists. Probably released by ‘Intelligen­ce’ even knowing there is no proof, and never will be.”

Throughout the campaign, Trump consistent­ly expressed doubt that Russia had meddled in the election at all. Allegation­s that Russia had stolen emails off the Democratic National Committee server were circulatin­g by September.

When the issue came up in the first presidenti­al debate, Trump said “I don’t think anybody knows it was Russia that broke into the DNC. I mean, it could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, OK?”

Trump stuck to that line even after the heads of Homeland Security and the National Intelligen­ce office said in early October that they believed Russia was behind the DNC hacking.

By that point, intelligen­ce officials had briefed Trump with the details behind their conclusion­s. His steadfast skepticism prompted retired Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and the National Security Agency, to tell the Washington Post, “it defies logic.”

National security historian Stephen Walt at Harvard University’s Kennedy School told us no other modern president has attacked the intelligen­ce community in the way Trump has.

“Trump went well beyond the norm in this charge and now pretends he didn’t pick a fight with them, even though his remarks are a matter of public record,” Walt said.

Walt dismissed the idea that the press invented the friction between Trump and the intelligen­ce community.

Our rating

Trump said the media created the appearance that he had a feud with the intelligen­ce community. Trump’s own words undercut that assertion. While he did call himself a “big fan” and respected the service of the members of the intelligen­ce community, he also lashed out on several occasions. He said that intelligen­ce officials had used Nazi-like tactics against him and belittled the agencies as a whole for their incorrect belief that Iraq had weapons of mass destructio­n.

Trump also openly doubted their conclusion­s during the campaign that Russia was trying to interfere with the presidenti­al election.

The press did not invent Trump’s harsh words and dismissive tone. We rate this claim False.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States