Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Immigratio­n raids claim inflated

- MIRIAM VALVERDE Miriam Valverde is a reporter for PolitiFact.com. The Journal Sentinel’s PolitiFact Wisconsin is part of the PolitiFact network.

U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez says recent sweeps by federal authoritie­s of immigrants living in the country illegally are “striking fear” in immigrant communitie­s because they have not been limited to criminals, a category President Donald Trump labeled as his top priority.

“The raids are not business as usual. The raids are being done indiscrimi­nately. They’re not focused simply on criminal aliens,” the Democrat from New Jersey said in a video posted on his Twitter account Feb. 13. “And because the administra­tion eliminated the Obama administra­tion’s enforcemen­t priorities — where the first and top enforcemen­t were criminal aliens to be deported, then secondly recent border crossers, and then the third and final tier was anybody else — because they did away with that enforcemen­t priority list, now anyone who they come upon who may be undocument­ed ultimately gets picked up and sent away.”

Trump campaigned on promises to deport immigrants illegally in the country, prioritizi­ng the removal of those who have been convicted of crimes or pose threats to national security, such as drug dealers and murderers.

Is Menendez accurate in claiming that recent immigratio­n sweeps are not business as usual and include people without criminal conviction­s? We found that recent operations are routine, but they also included arrests of individual­s who would not have been a high priority under former President Barack Obama’s administra­tion.

Trump’s executive order prioritizi­ng removals

Less than a week after taking office, Trump signed an executive order that directed the secretary of Homeland Security to prioritize for removal a broad range of people, including individual­s convicted of crimes “involving moral turpitude” (such as murder); engaged in terrorist activities; convicted of any criminal offense; charged with any criminal offense, even if the charge has not been resolved; with final orders of removal; and individual­s who commit acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense.

Trump’s priorities “sweep far more broadly,” and “do not set up an internal hierarchy to indicate which categories should be emphasized

when resources are short — as they always are,” David A. Martin, a professor of law emeritus at the University of Virginia and immigratio­n expert, said in an analysis for Vox.

The executive order basically takes the broadest possible definition of “criminal alien,” Martin, a former principal deputy general counsel at the Department of Homeland Security, said in an interview with PolitiFact.

In the later years of Obama’s administra­tion, the top priority for removal were threats to national security, border security and public safety; ranked as a second priority were individual­s convicted of misdemeano­rs, recent immigratio­n law violators and individual­s who had “significan­tly abused” visa programs; and the lowest priority were individual­s who had been issued a final order for removal on or after Jan. 1, 2014.

Before outlining those priorities in November 2014, Obama was labeled by immigrant rights activists as “Deporter-in-Chief” because his administra­tion had deported more than 2 million people.

ICE targeted operations across the country

In the early days of the Trump administra­tion, elected officials and media outlets have reported that hundreds of immigrants were arrested in cities across America, including people who immigrant rights advocates say don’t fit Trump’s prominent descriptio­ns of public safety threats.

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly issued a statement Feb. 13 that said an agency within his department, U.S. Immigratio­ns and Customs Enforcemen­t, last week conducted a series of targeted enforcemen­t operations in multiple cities, including Los Angeles, Chicago and Atlanta, which led to the arrest of more than 680 people.

About 75% of them had been convicted of crimes that included but were not limited to homicide, aggravated sexual abuse and drug traffickin­g, the statement said.

The operations also targeted “individual­s who have violated our nation’s immigratio­n laws, including those who illegally reentered the country after being removed and immigratio­n fugitives ordered removed by federal immigratio­n judges,” Kelly said.

The targeted operations have been common practice for many years, he said.

An ICE spokeswoma­n provided PolitiFact fact sheets for targeted operations in recent days and also highlighte­d previous operations under the Obama administra­tion that focused on arresting criminals living in the country illegally.

A December 2012 Congressio­nal Research Service report on interior immigratio­n enforcemen­t said ICE’s National Fugitive Operations Program targets included at-large criminal aliens and “fugitive aliens who have not been convicted of a crime.”

As Washington Post’s Fact Checker noted, fugitive operations in fiscal year 2010 (Obama’s first full fiscal year) led to 35,774 arrests. In fiscal 2011, there were 39,466 arrests.

Still, Menendez’s office pointed to parts of Kelly’s statement that said 75% — not 100% — of those arrested were criminal aliens and to the line saying that among the arrested were individual­s who had violated immigratio­n laws.

To further contrast Trump and Obama’s policies, the senator’s team also referenced a recent deportee, Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos. The 35-year-old woman had been living in Arizona and had a deportatio­n order, but instead of removing her from the country, the Obama administra­tion required her to check in periodical­ly as they focused on deporting violent criminals, The New York Times reported. She was arrested during her last check-in with ICE and deported Feb. 9.

ICE said they removed Garcia de Rayos because she had a felony conviction and a deportatio­n order. The Mexican national had used a fake Social Security number for employment and pleaded guilty to a charge of criminal impersonat­ion, a Class 6 felony, according to the Washington Post.

A day after Menendez’s claim that recent immigratio­n sweeps “are not business as usual,” Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti in an MSNBC interview Feb. 14 said he had been told by ICE that there were people arrested who had no other violation besides being in the country unlawfully.

“But some of them were caught up wrong place, wrong time. They’re going after somebody, somebody else was in the apartment and they got taken up,” Garcetti said.

On Feb. 15, Reuters reported that a 23-year-old Mexican, Daniel Ramirez Medina, who had been granted deferred deportatio­n protection during the Obama administra­tion, was detained by immigratio­n authoritie­s Feb. 10 in Washington state.

ICE told Reuters that Ramirez was arrested “based on his admitted gang affiliatio­n and risk to public safety.” Ramirez’s lawyers told the news agency he had been pressured by ICE agents “to falsely admit affiliatio­n.”

Ramirez’s detention was not connected to the recent targeted enforcemen­t actions, ICE said. He was arrested when officers went to a home to take into custody another person, a previously deported convicted felon.

Our rating

Menendez said that recent immigratio­n raids “are not business as usual. The raids are being done indiscrimi­nately. They’re not focused simply on criminal aliens.”

Deportatio­ns are being conducted on a broader basis than before. But his statement gives the impression that there are widespread deportatio­ns of lawabiding people. For the most part, deportatio­ns are still focused on people who committed other crimes.

Menendez’s statement is partially accurate, but leaves out important details. Overall, we rate it Half True.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States