Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Conservati­ves want health bill changes

House leaders resist demands

- ALAN FRAM

WASHINGTON - Conservati­ve Republican­s demanded tougher changes Friday in insurance requiremen­ts and Medicaid than the House GOP health care bill proposes and warned they’d oppose the legislatio­n if it isn’t reshaped. The White House signaled an openness to negotiate, but there was resistance from House leaders.

Less than two weeks before the GOP’s showpiece legislatio­n is slated to hit the House floor, the discord underscore­d the challenge facing top Republican­s trying to garner votes for legislatio­n scrapping former President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul.

It also raised questions about whether congressio­nal leaders reluctant to make changes were lagging behind a White House more willing to cut deals. And it illustrate­d anew the strained relationsh­ip between GOP leaders and some conservati­ves, even as the party tries to deliver on one of its highest profile goals.

“If that’s the best that they can do, then perhaps they have a different whip count than I have,” said Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), head of the conservati­ve House Freedom Caucus, suggesting the GOP legislatio­n lacked enough votes to pass.

One conservati­ve priority is quickly halting the extra money Obama’s law gives states to expand the federal-state Medicaid program for 70 million low-income people. The GOP bill would end that additional funding in 2020 except for recipients already in the program, but conservati­ves want to accelerate that date to 2018 to save money.

At the White House, spokesman Sean Spicer suggested Friday that President Donald Trump was showing flexibilit­y.

“If someone’s got an idea that can make this legislatio­n more accessible, give more choice to the American people, drive down costs, make it more patient-centered, he wants to listen to it,” Spicer said. He said Trump is “willing to listen to different individual­s” about the Medicaid date but added, “Right now the date that’s in the bill is what the president supports.”

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (RCalif.) told reporters earlier that moving up that date would be “very difficult to do.” Many moderates from the 31 states that expanded Medicaid — adding an extra 11 million people nationwide — don’t want the extra money to end sooner.

“Our best effort is what you see before us,” said Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), a leading author of the legislatio­n.

The GOP bill, approved this week by two House committees, would end Obama’s fines on people who don’t buy insurance and the federal subsidies many who purchase coverage receive. It would instead provide tax credits likely to be less generous for many Americans, curb Medicaid and let insurers charge higher premiums for people whose coverage lapses.

Leading conservati­ves said they want the bill to erase numerous coverage mandates Obama’s statute imposed, saying their top goal was to reduce consumers’ insurance costs including premiums. That law’s requiremen­ts include guaranteed coverage for people, even those with serious illnesses, and policies that cover 10 specified benefits such as maternity and mental health services.

“We’re not going to vote for it until we have a product that we like,” said Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho), a member of that group. “The issue is, are we going to drive down the cost of health care.”

The Freedom Caucus, which claims around 40 members, has been invited to the White House on Tuesday to go bowling with budget chief Mick Mulvaney and, lawmakers say, Trump.

McCarthy criticized cries by many conservati­ves for Congress to vote on a bill Obama vetoed last year that went further in repealing his statute. McCarthy said repealing Obama’s overhaul without approving the GOP legislatio­n “would be just as damaging” as leaving Obama’s law intact and would lead to a collapsed insurance market and higher premiums.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States