Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

EPA’s nonsensica­l rule hurts Sheboygan County

- JAKE CURTIS LUCAS VEBBER Jake Curtis is an associate counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty’s Center for Competitiv­e Federalism. Lucas Vebber is general counsel and director of environmen­tal and energy policy at Wisconsin Manufactur­ers & Co

Sheboygan County is home to dynamic companies, many of which contribute significan­tly to local communitie­s and our state and national economies. As a county that lies along the beautiful shores of Lake Michigan, the county’s residents and employers share a love for their environmen­t.

However, for nearly 20 years, the federal Environmen­tal Protection Agency has allowed a poorly placed compliance monitor to unfairly hold Sheboygan County accountabl­e for pollution that is generated elsewhere. The regulation­s that accompany the accountabi­lity required by EPA cost local businesses and create a narrative of a pollutionf­illed county that deflects those considerin­g relocating to Sheboygan County. Because of an inflexible federal law, there’s very little the state or county can do to resolve this situation.

Like Sheboygan, Wisconsin is a leader in manufactur­ing. It is our state’s top employment sector and is responsibl­e for roughly 20% of Wisconsin’s total economy. In eastern Wisconsin along Lake Michigan, one will find some of the highest concentrat­ions of manufactur­ing companies in the nation. From internatio­nally known manufactur­ers such as Oshkosh Truck to small businesses such as Plymouth Foam, eastern Wisconsin still makes “stuff” and they do it as well as anybody in the world.

Unfortunat­ely, far too often, the main impediment to growth and expansion is government regulation­s, especially from the federal government. Manufactur­ers in eastern Wisconsin face the daunting task of complying with onerous federal regulation­s to obtain the necessary permits to operate, all while key competitor­s, even within Wisconsin, are not required to do so. Such a scenario puts those who choose to grow a business along the shores of Lake Michigan at a distinct competitiv­e disadvanta­ge.

No regulation has been more nonsensica­l than the EPA’s applicatio­n of the Clean Air Act’s ambient air quality standards for ozone on Sheboygan County. On Sept. 28, the EPA proposed a rule that raises Sheboygan County’s ozone nonattainm­ent designatio­n from “marginal” to “moderate.” But the EPA made its decision based on an air monitor that detects pollutants generated outside the county, in places such as Chicago and Gary, Ind. A second monitor located north of the downtown and more reflective of the emissions actually generated by Sheboygan businesses would place the county in attainment. It has been ignored by EPA.

The most devastatin­g consequenc­e associated with the redesignat­ion is the direct limitation on growth. Companies in non-attainment areas must offset any new emissions that will result from proposed infrastruc­ture (i.e. a new plant) or a major modificati­on to existing infrastruc­ture by purchasing unused emissions credits from others, or by reducing one’s own emissions. Where no offset can be found, a project may not go forward.

The proposed reclassifi­cation rule received significan­t resistance from state and federal lawmakers, the business community that will be directly affected by the proposed rule and even the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

Congress can, and should, act now to provide muchneeded flexibilit­y to state and local units of government that simply want to use the most accurate data possible to comply with EPA regulation­s. Without such action, Sheboygan County (and others) will remain No Grow Zones, despite clean air and a very high quality of life.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States