Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Trump’s FBI claim misses mark

- JON GREENBERG Jon Greenberg is a reporter for PolitiFact.com. The Journal Sentinel’s PolitiFact Wisconsin is part of the PolitiFact network.

President Donald Trump talked about how the FBI handled its findings as it investigat­ed the Watergate break-in and its ties to the Nixon White House in a wide-ranging interview with The New York Times.

Here’s the transcript from that moment in the conversati­on with three reporters:

“When Nixon came along (inaudible) was pretty brutal, and out of courtesy, the FBI started reporting to the Department of Justice. But there was nothing official, there was nothing from Congress. There was nothing — anything. But the FBI person really reports directly to the president of the United States, which is interestin­g.”

Watergate began when a team from the re-election campaign of President Richard Nixon broke into the headquarte­rs of the Democratic National Committee, photograph­ed documents and bugged the phones. Police caught several team members at about 2:30 a.m. June 17, 1972, and an FBI investigat­ion began that same night.

The break-in, the cover-up and efforts by the White House to obstruct the work of the FBI led to multiple conviction­s and Nixon’s resignatio­n in August 1974.

In Trump’s view, as the investigat­ion moved forward, the FBI kept the Justice Department informed as a courtesy.

Trump’s statement runs into some problems with history.

Cleveland attorney James Robenalt, who offers a course on the lessons of Watergate, said there is no basis for Trump’s claim.

“The director of the FBI reports to the attorney general, and it was not a matter of ‘courtesy during Watergate’ to report to the Department of Justice, rather standard operating procedure,” he said. “For verificati­on, look at the organizati­on chart of the Department of Justice.”

The full chart clearly shows that the FBI answers to the attorney general and the deputy attorney general.

Benjamin Wittes, a fellow at the Brookings Institutio­n and the editor of Lawfare, a respected legal affairs blog, said there was a thread of accuracy behind his statement.

Watergate, Wittes said, was a turning point. Trump might have been thinking of what existed up to that time.

“There are a whole series of norms that developed in the post-Watergate era that the president stay out of investigat­ive matters and that we expect the FBI director to stay out of political matters,” Wittes said.

Certainly, the history of the FBI under the leadership of J. Edgar Hoover is chock full of instances where the FBI dealt directly with the White House. That took place even over the express orders of a series of attorneys general, including Robert F. Kennedy.

Wittes also said that the president has the power to hire and fire the FBI director and, in that sense, the director ultimately is answerable to the president.

But Trump made the broad assertion that there was “nothing official” that compelled the FBI to report to the Justice Department. We raised this issue with the White House press office and did not get an answer. We found that the historic record runs counter to Trump’s words.

The founding of the FBI

The annual reports of the Justice Department from 1907 to 1910 spell out in no uncertain terms that the FBI (known simply as the Bureau of Investigat­ion back then) was created precisely in order to report to the Justice Department.

Attorney General Charles Bonaparte under President Theodore Roosevelt first made the case for an investigat­ive division in his 1907 report to Congress.

“A Department of Justice with no force of permanent police in any form under its control is assuredly not fully equipped for its work,” he said.

Bonaparte created the bureau in 1908, as his successor noted in his report in 1909.

“A few days before July 1, 1908, under the direction of my predecesso­r, the first active steps were taken toward the organizati­on in this department of a comprehens­ive investigat­ion service for the purpose of collecting evidence for the use of the government in cases pending or about to be commenced in the federal courts, and also for making such other examinatio­ns and investigat­ions as the business of the department might require.”

The 1910 annual report noted that the attorney general is “kept constantly informed of the progress of all investigat­ions.”

Hoover, according to several historians, accepted the job in 1924 only on the understand­ing that “the Bureau will be responsibl­e only to the Attorney General.”

Even if Hoover didn’t follow that principle, the annual reports to Congress establish that the FBI was created by and for the Justice Department. From the very beginning, it reported to the department, and that practice didn’t start during Watergate.

In 1974, the Justice Department conducted its own review of the FBI’s actions in Watergate. It concluded that the agency “followed well establishe­d department­al policies” and “all informatio­n developed indicating any possible violations of federal law was properly referred to the department.”

In fact, in direct contradict­ion to Trump’s understand­ing, it faulted the FBI for sharing reports with Nixon’s White House counsel, calling it “probably the most serious blunder from an investigat­ive standpoint.”

“FBI reports should be disseminat­ed only to the prosecutor and certainly never to the White House,” the report said.

Our rating

Trump said “out of courtesy, the FBI started reporting to the Department of Justice” in the course of the Watergate investigat­ion, and that there was “nothing official.”

Justice Department annual reports dating from the birth of the FBI and the organizati­onal structure of the Justice Department show that Trump is wrong. During Watergate, the FBI reported to the Attorney General’s Office because that is what it was created to do. It was not a matter of courtesy.

Trump’s ability to hire and fire the FBI director gives him ultimate authority over the conduct of the FBI director, but that’s separate from the reporting obligation­s of the bureau to the Justice Department.

We rate this claim False.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States