Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Senate Republican­s stumble again on Obamacare

Tuesday, Wednesday both see failed GOP proposals to repeal all or part of ACA

-

WASHINGTON - Senate Republican­s trying to end the Affordable Care Act suffered their second procedural defeat in less than 24 hours Wednesday, underscori­ng how difficult it will be for the GOP to produce a bill despite their triumph in getting debate started on Tuesday.

The measure from Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky would have, in two years, repealed the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion and eliminated tax credits that help people purchase individual health insurance. The legislatio­n also would have immediatel­y repealed the individual mandate while continuing the Obamacare requiremen­t that insurers offer coverage to those with pre-existing conditions. It went down 45-55. Wednesday’s defeat comes after the main Republican proposal to replace the ACA was defeated 43-57 on Tuesday night, falling far short of the 60 votes required for passage.

That proposal, known as the Better

Care Reconcilia­tion Act, was introduced by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) immediatel­y after the Senate voted 51-50 on Tuesday to open debate on replacing Obamacare.

The defeat of both repeal measures appears to limit the scope of the Senate’s final legislatio­n to replace the ACA.

McConnell — who needs 50 senators to pass repeal legislatio­n under budget reconcilia­tion rules — is now likely to propose a less-comprehens­ive or “skinny” repeal bill that eliminates only a few major provisions of the health law.

Doing so would likely limit objections from moderate and conservati­ve Republican­s and allow McConnell to pass a Senate repeal measure that would then go to a conference committee of House and Senate Republican­s.

“We’ve described (the skinny bill) as a trojan horse,” or a “shell to move the process forward,” said Jacob Leibenluft, senior adviser at the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, “because as soon as you get to conference, you’re back in this discussion of repeal and replace.”

And if a straight repeal-and-replace bill comes out of the conference negotiatio­ns, it would be much harder for Republican moderates to vote against it because “it’s either take it or leave it,” Leibenluft said. “Either that bill passes or those senators (who vote against it) will be held responsibl­e for preserving the Affordable Care Act in the minds of their Republican voters.”

Media reports indicate McConnell’s “skinny” proposal would simply scrap the ACA’s individual mandate to purchase insurance, the employer mandate to provide insurance and the ACA tax on medical devices.

Conference members would merge the legislatio­n with the more-comprehens­ive House-passed American Health Care Act, which the Congressio­nal Budget Office found would leave 23 million Americans without health coverage.

That legislativ­e path appears more likely after the Senate parliament­arian on Tuesday ruled that several provisions of the Better Care Reconcilia­tion Act don’t meet budget reconcilia­tion rules and must have 60 votes to pass.

Those provisions include the so-called “age tax” that would allow insurers to charge older people five times more than younger plan members. The ACA allows them to charge three times more. A provision that allows the sale of associatio­n health plans would also require 60 votes for adoption.

Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson offered two amendments, one to end Congress’ special exemption from Obamacare and the other aimed at sustaining traditiona­l Medicaid for future generation­s.

Johnson has said Medicaid expansion under Obamacare made the program available to able-bodied, childless, working-age adults, which threatens program stability and could have an adverse effect on traditiona­l Medicaid enrollees — the elderly, disabled and children.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States