Trump order sparks criticism with transgender troops

Soldiers say his directive is step backwards

SAN DIEGO - Activeduty transgender troops say a policy change that puts them at risk of being removed and indefinitely bars transgender people from enlisting in the military is a step backward for civil rights that will promote inequality in the armed forces.

President Donald Trump on Friday directed the Pentagon to extend a ban on transgender individuals joining the military but gave the Pentagon the authority to decide the future of openly transgender people already serving. Trump appeared to leave open the possibility of allowing some transgender people who already are in uniform.

The guidance from the White House contradicts Trump’s words, Army Capt. Jennifer Sims said, pointing out that he just praised the military for its tolerance when he told veterans in Nevada on Wednesday that those in uniform come from all walks of life and are united by shared values and a shared sense of duty. Sims spoke to The Associated Press on her own behalf and not on behalf of the Army.

Days earlier, Trump, speaking to thousands of soldiers at the Army’s Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, in Arlington, Va., denounced prejudice, bigotry and hate in the wake of violence that erupted at a rally organized by white supremacists in Charlottesville, Va.

“It’s going to create this situation where there is a complete inequality in how transgender troops are treated,” said Sims, 28, who is based in Germany and is taking pills to prepare for her transition surgery. That is not the military’s problem, said Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, which has opposed allowing transgender people to serve.

“The armed forces are not just another equal opportunity employer,” Donnelly said in a statement.

The military’s limited funds, she added, should not be used “to indulge transgender demands.”

Transgender people have been allowed to serve openly in the military since June 2016. Trump, in a series of tweets on July 26, announced that he planned to end that policy.

The government “will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military,” he tweeted, contending that their service entailed “tremendous medical costs and disruption.”

A 2016 study by the RAND Corp. estimated it would cost the military $2.4 million to $8.4 million a year to provide gender transition-related coverage, an increase of 0.04% to 0.13% in health care spending for active-duty members. Researchers estimated 29 to 129 activeduty service members annually would seek such treatment.

Meanwhile, it would cost hundreds of millions of dollars to discharge thousands of transgender personnel, according to a study released this month by the Palm Center, an independent research institute.

The new guidance, as described by an official familiar with its contents but not authorized by the White House to discuss it publicly, appears to be less rigid than the complete ban that Trump tweeted about.

The official said the guidance puts a stop to recruitment of transgender individuals and prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for sexual reassignment surgery, except in cases where it’s deemed necessary to protect the health of an individual who has already begun the transition. But it would give Defense Secretary Jim Mattis six months to determine circumstances in which those currently in uniform who are openly transgender might be permitted to continue serving.

Jennifer Levi, an attorney with the LGBT-rights group GLAD, said that current policy “requires equal treatment of transgender service members, including that they are subject to the same standards of deployment as other soldiers.”

GLAD and another LGBT-rights organization this month sued in U.S. District Court in Washington on behalf of five transgender service members with nearly 60 years of combined military service. They had hoped to get a swift court decision on Trump’s tweet that could prevent a ban from taking effect.

“Any special or different rule for transgender soldiers is discrimination, plain and simple,” she said. “It also harms the military and, ultimately, the safety of our nation.”

“It’s going to create this situation where there is a complete inequality in how transgender troops are treated.” ARMY CAPT. JENNIFER SIMS DISCUSSING PRESIDENT’S DIRECTIVE ABOUT TRANSGENDER TROOPS