Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Fewer Americans buy insurance in coastal areas

Flood protection dropped after regulation­s changed

- TERRY SPENCER, MEGHAN HOYER AND MICHAEL KUNZELMAN

PLANTATION, Fla. - Amanda Spartz nearly did not renew her home’s flood insurance policy after her first year in Florida. Two hurricanes came close to the Fort Lauderdale suburbs last year, but they didn’t hit and her home isn’t in a high-risk flood zone. She figured she could put the $450 annual premium, due next week, to another use.

Then Harvey hit Houston, its historic rains causing massive floods even in low-risk neighborho­ods. Spartz, a business analyst, paid the bill this week.

If Spartz had dropped her policy, she would not have been alone. Far fewer Americans compared with five years ago are paying for flood insurance in coastal areas of the United States where hurricanes, storms and tidal surges pose a serious threat, according to an Associated Press analysis of government data. The center for the problem is South Florida, where Spartz lives. The top U.S. official overseeing the National Flood Insurance Program told the Associated Press that he wants to double the number of Americans who buy flood insurance.

“I was talking to my husband and I said that if something like Harvey happens here, I don’t want to be on the hook,” said Spartz, who relocated from

Cincinnati. “It isn’t a lot of money to save yourself the heartache if it does happen.”

What’s driving the drop in policies? Congress approved a price hike, making premiums more expensive, and maps of some high-risk areas were redrawn. Banks became lax at enforcing the requiremen­t that any home with a federally insured mortgage in a high-risk area be covered. Memories of New Orleans underwater in 2005 after Hurricane Katrina have faded.

Without flood insurance, storm victims would have to draw on savings or go into debt — or perhaps be forced to sell.

The number of policies in force today has fallen in 43 of the 50 states since 2012, dropping from almost 5.5 million to just under 5 million, a decrease of 10%, AP’s analysis found. In low-lying Florida, where by far more flood insurance policies are sold than in any other state, the drop has been almost 16%. In only two states — Hawaii and South Carolina — are at least 50% of homes in flood hazard areas insured under the program.

AP’s analysis also

showed the percentage of homes in high-risk areas that have flood insurance is sometimes frightenin­gly low. In Spartz’s home of Broward County, it’s only 13%. In Houston’s Harris County, it’s 28%. In New Orleans, it’s 46%.

Roy Wright, the director of the insurance program, which is administer­ed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, acknowledg­es that the decrease is alarming and says he hopes to double the number of policies in the near future. He also wants to persuade more communitie­s to limit constructi­on in high-risk flood zones.

Congress is likely to reauthoriz­e the insurance program before it expires Sept. 30.

President Donald Trump’s homeland security adviser, Tom Bossert, said he expects changes to the flood program to be debated on Capitol Hill later this fall, after the immediate Houston recovery is underway.

“This administra­tion’s been pretty clear that we’d like to see some responsibl­e reforms to the National Flood Insurance Program,” he said Thursday at the White House. “I don’t think now’s the time to debate those things.”

Last year, the program collected about $3.3 billion in premiums

and paid out about $3.7 billion for losses. FEMA paid out $3.5 billion per year over the past 12 years, which included Katrina.

“It is about consumer choice. It’s about consumer education. It’s about an education related to flood risk. It’s about communitie­s galvanizin­g around it. It’s also about communitie­s making choices about how they want to build going into the future so that people are at less risk. When they are at less risk, their premiums are cheaper,” Wright told the AP.

One way to compel more homeowners to buy policies would be for banks to enforce the coverage requiremen­t for homeowners with a federally insured mortgage if they live in a Special Flood Hazard Area. Experts said that’s not happening. Many homeowners let the policy lapse after a few years, correctly thinking the bank will not check. Or a bank will sell mortgages to another bank, and paperwork on whether homes require flood insurance isn’t reviewed. About 7 in 10 homeowners have a mortgage.

FEMA periodical­ly redraws flood-risk maps, moving some homes from mandatory-carry areas to a less-risky category. When the requiremen­t is lifted, homeowners gamble or believe

their home is no longer in danger. As Harvey proved, a lower-risk neighborho­od is not a norisk neighborho­od.

After the city of Central, La., successful­ly petitioned FEMA last year to change its flood maps, it sent letters notifying roughly 2,000 residents that their homes no longer were inside the high-risk zone. Kyle Cutrer didn’t get flood insurance when he purchased a house in Central last summer, outside the flood zone.

Last August, a slowmoving storm dumped an estimated 7 trillion gallons of rainwater on south Louisiana, more than two feet of rain in some places.

A foot of water washed into Cutrer’s home, causing approximat­ely $40,000 in damage. He used about $16,000 from FEMA to pay for some repairs; he paid the rest himself.

Cutrer said his realestate agent and mortgage company had both assured him he did not need flood insurance, which would have cost him about $300 annually.

“I was told, ‘You’ll never flood. You won’t have a problem here,’ ” he said. “As a first-time homebuyer, I was trying to keep that note as low as possible.”

A week after the flood, he called his insurance agent and purchased a flood policy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States