Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Shootings rekindle gun debate

- TOM KERTSCHER Email: tkertscher@journalsen­tinel.com; Twitter: twitter.com/kertschern­ews; Facebook: fb.com/politifact­wisconsin

In the first hours after Sunday’s mass shooting in Las Vegas, many of the details — including the gunman’s mental state and motive, and any groups he might have been part of — remained unclear.

But the incident did spark a new debate about guns and gun control.

In what is being called the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history, early news reports said the gunman killed more than 50 people outside a Las Vegas casino-hotel.

Here’s a look at five fact checks we did in the wake of the June 2016 mass shooting at a nightclub in Orlando, Fla., which killed 49.

Ron Johnson: “Assault rifles already are banned.”

Our rating: Mostly False. The U.S. senator and Wisconsin Republican said the only weapons that are automatic — firing continuous­ly when the trigger is held down — are assault weapons. Those are essentiall­y prohibited by federal laws. But that definition is narrow, and Johnson’s claim gives a misleading impression of a comprehens­ive ban.

Lawmakers, law enforcemen­t officials and others widely refer to many semiautoma­tic weapons like the rifle used in Orlando — which reload automatica­lly but fire only once each time the trigger is depressed — as assault weapons. Those are not banned by federal law.

Paul Ryan: “People have a constituti­onal right to have semiautoma­tic rifles.”

Our rating: Mostly True.

Despite the statement by the U.S. House speaker and Wisconsin Republican, the U.S. Supreme Court has not explicitly declared that Americans have a constituti­onal right to semiautoma­tic rifles. And states can, within certain parameters, put restrictio­ns on those guns. But generally speaking, experts told us, semiautoma­tic rifles are a legal weapon that fall under the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Gwen Moore: “If you’re a terrorist you can’t fly,” but “an assault weapon you can buy.”

Our rating: Mostly True. This statement was made by the Democratic congresswo­man from Milwaukee.

Terrorists, as well as people deemed potential terrorists who are on the federal government’s no-fly list, are prohibited from flying. Terrorists who have a felony conviction can’t legally buy guns, but people on the government’s terrorist watch list can, assuming they aren’t disqualifi­ed for some other reason.

Ryan: Under the current procedure, if someone “on a terror watch list” tries to buy a gun, authoritie­s are notified.

Our rating: Half True. The statement was accurate as it applied to gun sales in which a federal background check occurs. But a significan­t number of gun sales or other transfers lack background checks, so there would be no red flag when someone on the list tries to buy a gun.

Tammy Baldwin: The Orlando shooter used “a weapon of war.”

Our rating: Half True. Baldwin, a Democratic U.S. senator from Wisconsin, backed up her statement by showing that the gun used in Orlando was originally designed for military use. But that gunman had a civilian version of that gun that lacked key attributes of a military-style weapon. However, it’s also significan­tly different from weapons typically used by civilians for hunting.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States