‘Do Not Resuscitate’ tattoo creates dilemma
Ethics experts critical of doctors’ initial decision
An unconscious 70-year-old man was rushed to an emergency room in Miami, Florida, earlier this year.
He had no identification, family or friends with him when he arrived. However, he had a tattoo across his chest that said, “Do Not Resuscitate.” It included a signature.
The man’s ink left doctors with an ethical dilemma — save the man’s life or honor the tattoo and let him die?
The case was published Thursday in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“This patient’s tattooed DNR request produced more confusion than clarity, given concerns about its legality and likely unfounded beliefs that tattoos might represent permanent reminders of regretted decisions made while the person was intoxicated,” one of the paper’s author, Gregory Holt, a doctor at the University of Miami Hospital, wrote.
The article said the man was taken to Jackson Memorial Hospital .
Doctors first decided not to honor the DNR request, “invoking the principle of not choosing an irreversible path when faced with uncertainty,” the study said.
But they asked for an ethics consultation. The consultants disagreed with their decision.
“As unorthodox as it is, you do get a dramatic view of what this patient would want,” Ken Goodman, co-director of the University of Miami’s ethics programs told the Atlantic Journal.
Social workers later used the man’s fingerprints to track down his DNR paperwork, required in Florida to make such a request legally valid, supporting the end of life wishes inked on his skin. The patient died the next morning. Arthur Caplan, head of the division of medical ethics at the New York University School of Medicine, told The Washington Post a tattoo should be a binding request.
“A tattoo, I think, is best seen as a way to alert medical staff to your wishes,” he said. “It’s useful to back up a living will or an advanced directive.”