Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Lincoln Hills and Missouri recidivism comparison wrong

- Tom Kertscher Email: tkertscher@journalsen­tinel.com; Twitter: @PolitiFact­Wisc; Facebook: Facebook.com/PolitiFact­Wisconsin

For two years, Wisconsin’s youth prison for males has been under an FBI-led criminal investigat­ion into allegation­s of prisoner abuse, child neglect, sexual assault, intimidati­on of witnesses and victims, strangulat­ion and tampering with public records.

Should the facility, Lincoln Hills School, be shut down?

That question was posed to Wisconsin Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz in an interview on Nov. 21, the day after the Oshkosh Democrat toured Lincoln Hills. Responding to Wisconsin Eye TV host Steven Walters, Hintz said an alternativ­e would have to be developed first. Then he made a statement that seemed to indict the facility, saying:

We have a 66% recidivism rate for the kids there, in the three years after they get out. States like Missouri, that have more of a regional model — 8%.

So, 66% of Lincoln Hills inmates commit new offenses within three years of being released?

And that’s eight times higher than in states such as Missouri, which has been held up as a potential model for Wisconsin?

We’ll see that, as national experts have stated, comparing states on juvenile recidivism is not easily done.

The trouble at Lincoln Hills

Lincoln Hills generally holds inmates as young as 13 and as old as 25, with most inmates in their mid-to late-teens; some adults are being held for crimes they committed as juveniles. Incarcerat­ing an inmate there costs more than $100,000 a year.

Groups such as Youth Justice Milwaukee, which is calling for Wisconsin’s youth prisons to be closed, argue that conditions at Lincoln Hills can lead to higher recidivism — inmates committing new offenses after they’re released. Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele has gone even further than Hintz, saying 75% of Lincoln Hills inmates fall back into criminal activity.

Meanwhile, Missouri — when facing problems similar to those at Lincoln Hills, such as fights between inmates, long stints in solitary confinemen­t and injuries inflicted by guards — replaced large institutio­ns with small facilities closer to young offenders’ homes.

But the contrast in recidivism between the two states is not how Hintz portrays it.

Partially accurate evidence

To back Hintz’s claim, his office cited a January report by the nonpartisa­n Wisconsin Legislativ­e Fiscal Bureau. It says that according to the latest available data, Lincoln Hills has a threeyear recidivism rate of 63%. That is, 278 juveniles were released from Lincoln Hills in 2011 and 63% returned to either a juvenile correction­al facility or an adult prison or were placed on probation for a new offense by 2014.

So, Hintz’s claim of a 66% recidivism rate at Lincoln Hills is high by only 3 percentage points.

Missouri’s definition of recidivism is roughly similar to Wisconsin’s, but has four parts. It includes youths who are sent back to the juvenile system, are sent to adult prison, are put on probation or are put into a 120day program.

But the latest State of Missouri figures show Missouri’s three-year recidivism rate, for 2013 to 2016, is 30%. That’s far less than Lincoln Hills’ 63%. But it’s also much higher than the 8% Hintz claimed.

That lower rate applies only to the first part of Missouri’s recidivism definition — youths who commit new offenses and are sent back to the youth system.

Apples and oranges

There are also other problems with comparing Lincoln Hills to Missouri:

❚ Latest three-year recidivism rate: Lincoln Hills’ is 20112014; Missouri’s is 2013-2016.

❚ Lincoln Hills: Only male inmates; Missouri’s system: male and female offenders.

❚ Lincoln Hills inmates have committed serious, violent crimes — including homicide and robbery — or have had repeated run-ins with the law and didn’t turn their behavior around after being sent to group homes. Missouri’s youths have committed a wide variety of offenses, from serious felonies to truancy and curfew violations.

Those create a major applesto-oranges problem for Hintz’s statement, particular­ly the fact Missouri’s count includes many less serious offenders than Lincoln Hills.

Our rating

Hintz says Wisconsin’s Lincoln Hills youth prison has a “66% recidivism rate,” while “states like Missouri, that have more of a regional model — 8%.”

He is essentiall­y correct on Wisconsin. The latest figures show that 63% of Lincoln Hills offenders are returned to either a juvenile correction­al facility or an adult prison or were placed on probation for a new offense within three years of being released.

But the comparison to Missouri misses on several counts. Missouri reports a three-year youth recidivism rate of 30%, not 8% — and even that is misleading. While Lincoln Hills incarcerat­es only serious male offenders, Missouri’s youth correction­al system includes males and females who commit offenses ranging from serious crimes to truancy. So, Hintz is comparing two significan­tly different population­s.

Hintz’s statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression — our definition of Mostly False.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States