Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Transporta­tion claim bumpy

- Tom Kertscher

In his “state of the state” speech on Jan. 24, which was something of a launching pad for his run for a third term as governor, Republican Scott Walker drew contrasts between himself and his predecesso­r, Democrat Jim Doyle.

Despite criticism for not spending more on transporta­tion, Walker neverthele­ss claimed he’s done better than Doyle, stating:

“We invested” in our transporta­tion system “$24 billion over eight years. That’s $3 billion more than what former Governor Jim Doyle spent on transporta­tion over the same period of time.”

Walker has made the same claim for at least 11 months, on Twitter, in a weekly radio address, in media interviews and in public appearance­s.

The numbers

The nonpartisa­n Legislativ­e Fiscal Bureau told us it’s possible to reach Walker’s figures by

considerin­g the total raw dollars put toward transporta­tion programs, including a double count of the principal in terms of money borrowed.

That is, Walker’s method counts the principal at the time money was borrowed and counts it again when repayments are made on that debt. That method shows Walker’s eight years of DOT funding, in raw dollars, including bonding and subsequent debt service payments, at $25.8 billion — $3.4 billion more than Doyle.

But besides doing the double counting, that measure also fails to take into account inflation.

So, it is problemati­c in two ways.

Here are the fiscal bureau numbers without the double counting but including inflation:

❚ Doyle — 2003-’11: $18.7 billion

❚ Walker — 2011-’19: $17.4 billion

Those figures show that Doyle, in real dollars, spent $1.3 billion more on transporta­tion than Walker has.

We ran into a similar issue when Walker said a year ago the state is “investing more money into education than ever before in the history of Wisconsin.” Our rating was Mostly False, since it didn’t take into account inflation, which is the best way to measure amounts over time.

Our rating

Walker says “we invested” in our transporta­tion system “$24 billion over eight years. That’s $3 billion more than what former Governor Jim Doyle spent on transporta­tion over the same period of time.”

Walker’s claim uses raw dollars and counts the total amount of bonding, debt service and all funds put toward transporta­tion. But that double-counts the principal and ignores inflation.

Excluding the double counting and taking into account inflation — that is, real dollars spent on transporta­tion — Doyle actually spent more in his eight years than Walker has in his.

We rate Walker’s statement Mostly False.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States